From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1I7T6f-000249-Cn for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 08 Jul 2007 09:31:05 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l689TuOC022045; Sun, 8 Jul 2007 09:29:56 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l689S0UE019722 for ; Sun, 8 Jul 2007 09:28:00 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D896E652F8 for ; Sun, 8 Jul 2007 09:27:59 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -0.908 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.908 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.908] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ANJWYlc-Y+0M for ; Sun, 8 Jul 2007 09:27:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB60164BEA for ; Sun, 8 Jul 2007 09:27:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1I7T3W-0007qZ-Mq for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Sun, 08 Jul 2007 11:27:50 +0200 Received: from gw.ptr-80-238-235-157.customer.ch.netstream.com ([80.238.235.157]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 08 Jul 2007 11:27:50 +0200 Received: from dev-zero by gw.ptr-80-238-235-157.customer.ch.netstream.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 08 Jul 2007 11:27:50 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: =?UTF-8?B?VGl6aWFubyBNw7xsbGVy?= Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: John Jawed & Alex Tarkovsky's einput eclass Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2007 11:27:39 +0200 Organization: Gentoo Message-ID: References: <468F85BC.9060102@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig18A9B0A8B0199870D4077B80" X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: gw.ptr-80-238-235-157.customer.ch.netstream.com User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (X11/20070618) In-Reply-To: <468F85BC.9060102@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.1 Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 486a7433-b82a-48c7-b4a7-675b5fb0e918 X-Archives-Hash: e9c9de4f18d432012c8617232916c3eb This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig18A9B0A8B0199870D4077B80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable R=C3=A9mi Cardona schrieb: > As you pointed it out, ebuilds should not be interactive. Imho, adding > an eclass to encourage it is counter-productive. While that's true, there might be a use case in pkg_config. For example postgresql which needs quiet a few parameters to initialize the first database cluster. If we could present the user a couple of options in a list where he can just select the one he wants. Cheers, Tiziano --------------enig18A9B0A8B0199870D4077B80 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGkK4PGwVqY66cHjARAhc2AJ9xgrd4SNIXmvBX9cxFlKNcp93xYwCeKhBf wCjr8jFXZLLJkhYircLEISY= =KksF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig18A9B0A8B0199870D4077B80-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list