From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1I6zY2-0007dD-At for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 07 Jul 2007 01:57:22 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l671uMbE002228; Sat, 7 Jul 2007 01:56:22 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l671sPYk032315 for ; Sat, 7 Jul 2007 01:54:25 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB5E864FB2 for ; Sat, 7 Jul 2007 01:54:24 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -0.678 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.678 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.678] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CUEh24ILmzH9 for ; Sat, 7 Jul 2007 01:54:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A08E6569E for ; Sat, 7 Jul 2007 01:54:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1I6zUw-0000k9-OS for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Sat, 07 Jul 2007 03:54:10 +0200 Received: from static24-72-114-155.yorkton.accesscomm.ca ([24.72.114.155]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 07 Jul 2007 03:54:10 +0200 Received: from dirtyepic by static24-72-114-155.yorkton.accesscomm.ca with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 07 Jul 2007 03:54:10 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Ryan Hill Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Feedback req: Confirm/thank on bug fix or is that unwanted bug spam? Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2007 19:53:57 -0600 Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: static24-72-114-155.yorkton.accesscomm.ca User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5pre (X11/20070701) In-Reply-To: Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 31b8dc9f-9e75-4a7b-9844-9a046ad680f7 X-Archives-Hash: cbcc49f0cd2bf63d6e6441a4a267aabd Duncan wrote: > When I open or CC on a bug that then gets fixed, I often feel like adding > a thanks to the bug. However, while it may be polite in other > circumstances, in this case it could be viewed as bug spam, so I've > hesitated. I don't think anyone can be opposed to a thank you. Keep it coming. ;) -- dirtyepic salesman said this vacuum's guaranteed gentoo org it could suck an ancient virus from the sea 9B81 6C9F E791 83BB 3AB3 5B2D E625 A073 8379 37E8 (0x837937E8) -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list