From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1I2ZDk-0007NV-BI for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 21:02:08 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l5OL1CEC000330; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 21:01:12 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l5OKxFGr029153 for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 20:59:16 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 507EE64C9F for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 20:59:15 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: 0.665 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.665 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.588, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=1.253] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jpev3lIkfK5Z for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 20:59:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 746F764C86 for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 20:59:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1I2Z7y-000124-1R for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 22:56:10 +0200 Received: from 82.153.39.3 ([82.153.39.3]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 22:56:09 +0200 Received: from slong by 82.153.39.3 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 22:56:09 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Steve Long Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: RFC: Unifying the behavior of the doc use flag and document it Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 21:50:46 +0100 Message-ID: References: <467D2A04.6080504@gentoo.org> <20070623162942.74635a1d@sheridan.genone.homeip.net> <467D2F72.1020909@gentoo.org> <8cd1ed20706240642l23d9db05g430758fcbc6c6c60@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.153.39.3 User-Agent: KNode/0.10.4 Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: fb0134aa-ab8f-45a2-9e9f-e460646ba379 X-Archives-Hash: f2ade07aeb61ebbfac8dfe8bfd9a2214 Kent Fredric wrote: >> ++ I was only thinking of the programmer:user difference, since code docs >> tend to pull in a lot of stuff, where as end-user docs are normally >> supplied in an easier format (eg not dox ;) rebuild-docs as a one-shot >> flag is great. >> >> Would there be a way to control what kind of markup is output (assuming a >> package supports it)? For example, to specify that files should be for >> text-only or graphical browser (where both would be the default.) XeTeX >> -- PS -- PDF is another along those lines. > > I can just feel a USE expansion coming on. > > DOC="none pdf txt man ps html info all rebuild" sounds like just a > bunch for starters. > > Any votees? > Not me, I'm afraid, unless this is the only way to do it.. I agree that they should only apply to single packages, not across the tree. Although, if I'm honest, I don't know what that breaks. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list