From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1I09Qc-0006Td-JP for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 05:05:27 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l5I54Lv7013346; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 05:04:21 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l5I52YDi011077 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 05:02:35 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46E796507E for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 05:02:34 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: 0.638 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.638 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.615, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=1.253] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IFSZCVQqLS14 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 05:02:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C1066506F for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 05:02:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1I09Nf-0000Hn-7W for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 07:02:23 +0200 Received: from 82.153.10.125 ([82.153.10.125]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 07:02:23 +0200 Received: from slong by 82.153.10.125 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 07:02:23 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Steve Long Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: QA issue: No stable skype in Tree Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 06:01:07 +0100 Message-ID: References: <46701D06.5080302@gentoo.org> <20070617140632.GB7280@localhost.localdomain> <20070617201008.66b1340c@maya> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.153.10.125 User-Agent: KNode/0.10.4 Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 32178a69-17e2-4ea7-8911-878e09dcf539 X-Archives-Hash: 8d392687c0ebaad58fff9557f2eadd1e Stephen Bennett wrote: > Not everyone sees that as a reason not to use a potentially useful > piece of software. We're not debian. Could you clarify whether this is indeed a Gentoo QA issue, or in fact a licensing issue? If the latter case, this discussion should prob'y go to the new -project ml if and when, or indeed the user forums. As for potentially useful, so was Internet Explorer, last time I looked at what you could do with its Object Model. I still ain't voting to bring it to Gentoo.. ;) -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list