From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HxSvn-0006ki-0a for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 19:18:31 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l5AJHVhd008373; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 19:17:31 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l5AJFaQE006098 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 19:15:37 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5565C64A5E for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 19:15:36 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: 0.376 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.376 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.877, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=1.253] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id joxVguHLqKw2 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 19:15:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9590064893 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 19:15:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HxSsZ-0006cl-1v for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 21:15:11 +0200 Received: from 82.152.168.118 ([82.152.168.118]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 21:15:11 +0200 Received: from slong by 82.152.168.118 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 21:15:11 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Steve Long Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo/Alpha status Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 20:13:11 +0100 Message-ID: References: <466AC1D4.4040700@gentoo.org> <20070609235803.206dd337@maya> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.152.168.118 User-Agent: KNode/0.10.4 Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 77a293c4-78df-447f-99ab-f78a2d9e00f6 X-Archives-Hash: d87b10540663f3d40b670966b1c31f0f Stephen Bennett wrote: >> P.D: for those of you worried out there: *NO*. Gentoo/Alpha is *not* >> going to have a different default package manager than the rest of >> Gentoo ;) > > ...yet. > > *flees* yeah that was a valuable technical insight wasn't it? oh noez it was another one of those crap irc jokes that belongs in the bin. Gee: thanks for increasing the SNR. QA: what's that? Oh noez gentoo has none (apparently..) can't think why; must be lack of software that can run configure && make install.. let's ditch our programming language! -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list