From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HwibW-0000Nb-Ec for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 08 Jun 2007 17:50:30 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l58HnJlD032221; Fri, 8 Jun 2007 17:49:19 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l58HlOCL030004 for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2007 17:47:25 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FE0A64BE6 for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2007 17:47:24 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -1.046 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.046 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-1.046] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Da6O52B9gWut for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2007 17:47:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66F6F64B9A for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2007 17:47:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HwiYD-0007z7-IK for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Fri, 08 Jun 2007 19:47:05 +0200 Received: from ppp-82-135-5-161.dynamic.mnet-online.de ([82.135.5.161]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 08 Jun 2007 19:47:05 +0200 Received: from genstef by ppp-82-135-5-161.dynamic.mnet-online.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 08 Jun 2007 19:47:05 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Stefan Schweizer Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Non-Dev Contributors and the Tree Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 19:46:39 +0200 Message-ID: References: <4667EF71.9010103@gentoo.org> <8cd1ed20706080001g3a58b15ej3ef9fe67d143d80d@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp-82-135-5-161.dynamic.mnet-online.de User-Agent: KNode/0.10.5 Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: c62315ac-6640-4307-b02e-48a4b1f688ef X-Archives-Hash: fe19828f42e3e0c6f438e21900db7525 Steve Long wrote: > Dunno what the procedure might end up becoming, but my understanding is > commit right to the sunrise overlay, from where a dev has to commit it to > the main tree. It seems like a logical extension of sunrise, and i am sure > there are stats on who has submitted what to sunrise in the past. So there > is a baseline for whom to invite to become s. Snrise already has such an "extension". A portage-review/ subdirectory, where ebuilds from the gentoo-x86 + changes can be posted. A dev then takes those and reviews them to the main tree and removes them again from the dir The process has worked really good so far. I suggest you to read up on how this is currently being done on overlays.gentoo.org/proj/sunrise and if you are interested I invite you to join #gentoo-sunrise to see how it is done. The current log: http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/sunrise/log/portage-review You will notice the regular "in portage", "now reviewed", "in cvs" messages Best regards, Stefan -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list