From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 335DE138334 for ; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 18:05:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 783BFE08E2; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 18:04:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CF13E089F for ; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 18:04:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiot (c134-66.icpnet.pl [85.221.134.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6B16C34D7C2; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 18:04:56 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] package.deprecated: Create initial template From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2019 19:04:50 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <20191205160957.576971-1-mgorny@gentoo.org> <067cc5678d1eb4a3445bdf7beefe8c055307eeb4.camel@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-6KEX5qPcBtu/wnFsr1hg" User-Agent: Evolution 3.32.4 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: 800cb913-3674-45d3-af3c-f88722446568 X-Archives-Hash: 7cea59685787ea843cafac3ff8e7d08c --=-6KEX5qPcBtu/wnFsr1hg Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2019-12-05 at 18:59 +0100, Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Thu, 2019-12-05 at 18:39 +0100, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > > On Thu, 2019-12-05 at 17:36 +0100, Alexis Ballier wrote: > > > On Thu, 2019-12-05 at 17:09 +0100, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > > > > +################################################################ > > > > #### > > > > +# > > > > +# This file specifies packages that are considered deprecated > > > > (but > > > > not > > > > +# masked yet). It will trigger pkgcheck warnings whenever other > > > > +# packages depend on them. > > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > repoman would be more useful for this > > >=20 > >=20 > > Then feel free to take repoman over, and start maintaining it. I've > > lost interest in contributing to the project after the last pointless > > refactoring made adding anything even more effort, and it doesn't > > seem > > that anyone else has. > >=20 > > Given that pkgcheck is a. faster by design, b. running checks > > in parallel, c. has sane API making contributing a pleasure, I don't > > really see a point in putting any more effort to support a dead > > repoman. > >=20 >=20 > it's not about who's maintaining what here... > just s/pkgcheck/QA tools/ and be done with it Oh, I've listed pkgcheck there because it's the only tool implementing the file at the moment. I'm happy to replace it with larger list or something more generic once there are other tools. However, I believe that saying 'pkgcheck' right now has the advantage that devs know which tool to use to see the result. > unless i missed something, repoman is still the standard for pre-commit= =20 > checks and raising everyone's attention on potential > improvements/issues; Nope. Per quite recent Council meeting pkgcheck is fully acceptable alternative, and to my knowledge a number of devs have switched already. Because they value their time and good package quality. > pkgcheck is mostly used by your CI checks for > producing huge reports, which is nice but addresses a different problem There is nothing stopping you from running pkgcheck locally. In fact, it should work out of the box these days. If you have any problems, please report them and I'm sure they will be addressed promptly. > i could see this file being useful for auto-generating lists on qa- > reports like for eapis too I don't think there's really a point in duplicating this. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --=-6KEX5qPcBtu/wnFsr1hg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGTBAABCgB9FiEEx2qEUJQJjSjMiybFY5ra4jKeJA4FAl3pRsNfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEM3 NkE4NDUwOTQwOThEMjhDQzhCMjZDNTYzOUFEQUUyMzI5RTI0MEUACgkQY5ra4jKe JA5dlggAvhpjf4tlbBe90PUZfmZKwr3UQUo4S3sZNkZg7Gpb7AbWllcha0OpNVaD h7j27TnD7kuQ76ZXLXUZXuvGlXyXSQtel3IhxESzpHbHgsxgSZiK7HJ5PwsNoqFf hctpgLWTv5XpOjHpqcSmBhrDRumxBTR5ZHy2EULt9GaNFGbY5RcgDdmlp7UnKMqn 8sWaUY8Ibt1jxGIzOUk6F58vneOo9me+HlrRydYFOmBf8VikDpMG7BaAxRXlKm7c NSOhfYtHy5Ql4EPSwBV7YN0c1AZaOVhhvt9YQXWnThVrMvubWSLboZVut0oNNJB6 0ZpOGjMBIYiIxcFxAFXJSimzx6+weg== =oqYD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-6KEX5qPcBtu/wnFsr1hg--