From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0A30138334 for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 19:22:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4E69AE08C0; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 19:22:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 044DAE0826 for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 19:22:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiot (c142-245.icpnet.pl [85.221.142.245]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CBCF534DA34; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 19:22:01 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Needs ideas: Upcoming circular dependency: expat <> CMake From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 20:21:58 +0100 In-Reply-To: <6c75f3fe-1a89-680b-a60b-d62c4172d33f@gentoo.org> References: <1a722f8f-36b5-c313-b6e1-eac75e0839c5@gentoo.org> <85c9df6f-fcf5-61d7-90af-a375f5c75088@gentoo.org> <20191218235822.5b036cf2@sf> <8a987393-685c-b9d8-df19-471603fbe10b@gentoo.org> <97ea301701198a8a81d7b65a23b2757783d11d6d.camel@gentoo.org> <1c21f87e-ccea-cabc-5c19-1414aaf029a5@gentoo.org> <6c75f3fe-1a89-680b-a60b-d62c4172d33f@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-59qKZ8+b8n2Ba/YDhZ0o" User-Agent: Evolution 3.32.5 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: a4adf322-efeb-48e1-bcdb-d899319edc4a X-Archives-Hash: 6f61cdfa06bbbb6d3841c10cd79eaa51 --=-59qKZ8+b8n2Ba/YDhZ0o Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2019-12-19 at 19:43 +0100, Sebastian Pipping wrote: > On 19.12.19 18:37, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > > We have a better alternative that lets us limit the impact on the users= . > > Why not use it? >=20 > Which one? The CMake bootstrap copy? The adding to stage3 one? >=20 Bootstrap version. It doesn't have to be a strict copy. The whole point is that even if it's buggy, unmaintained, vulnerable, it's impact is going to be minimal. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --=-59qKZ8+b8n2Ba/YDhZ0o Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGTBAABCgB9FiEEx2qEUJQJjSjMiybFY5ra4jKeJA4FAl37zdZfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEM3 NkE4NDUwOTQwOThEMjhDQzhCMjZDNTYzOUFEQUUyMzI5RTI0MEUACgkQY5ra4jKe JA69tgf9Eni+uliAQpzm9TKVKdFNRM+NVnvosA6UIgB+GAaeQghumycWOpQP5HGW niZUb3v1ukbia7hGIh4iOhCFft1GyTEewiP5+G6ix2J0oyg0XzQW08pe+MtEXb11 zFFp1gODcsbo05gtsfHM/dsDHgnLiai1Js3hBROlJHtPSpzJanmavTxqifgs06Rr Xjm5S/4+vxeouUa5xWuH1GSm9tkPhXiqTP2ZMkZaKUzeAQVypYhx+sKK6ySdFQc8 BdhFhRJt4Nqu3tw8xch8ndvr3+zVhvsjt7xPROdBHzQdlPtVAirndBap2JC/Ono9 Au0oKN24XBI9d7mn9D2HB496VSSU7Q== =QyGY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-59qKZ8+b8n2Ba/YDhZ0o--