From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1Hlrwj-0006Yl-Gz for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 09 May 2007 19:35:33 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l49JYY4t023512; Wed, 9 May 2007 19:34:34 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l49JWXSY021157 for ; Wed, 9 May 2007 19:32:34 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C71764DF9 for ; Wed, 9 May 2007 19:32:33 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: 0.607 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.607 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.723, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=1.253, TW_TB=0.077] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wFneEg2XYSVM for ; Wed, 9 May 2007 19:32:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8467464D46 for ; Wed, 9 May 2007 19:32:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Hlrtg-0006lW-Or for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Wed, 09 May 2007 21:32:24 +0200 Received: from 82.153.14.170 ([82.153.14.170]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 09 May 2007 21:32:24 +0200 Received: from slong by 82.153.14.170 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 09 May 2007 21:32:24 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Steve Long Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC - Moving categories around] Date: Wed, 09 May 2007 20:29:31 +0100 Message-ID: References: <200705091708.21686.peper@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.153.14.170 User-Agent: KNode/0.10.4 Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: aef9be43-f264-453d-a004-4f3a023bd801 X-Archives-Hash: 7356069584c5947e6ffca8556704b8fb Piotr Jaroszy?ski wrote: > On Wednesday 09 of May 2007 08:04:44 Alec Warner wrote: >> The new layout would be: > I would reserve the breakage for something more useful. Not that I don't > like the idea, just imho such a layout change alone is not worth it. > If you were to have such a wide-ranging change, what else would you do? So far we have tidying up categories and: > support for packages belonging to multiple categories, multiple names >for a single package I seem to recall there were some other tree-wide changes discussed in #-portage, but tbh they went over my head. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list