From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05AA9158066 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2024 04:59:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 92346E2A67; Mon, 19 Aug 2024 04:59:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (mail.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D17BE2A64 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2024 04:59:46 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 07:59:34 +0300 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Handling installed tests To: Sam James Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <87ttftr9ay.fsf@gentoo.org> <87msl98xbt.fsf@gentoo.org> Content-Language: en-US From: Joonas Niilola In-Reply-To: <87msl98xbt.fsf@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------7dMmHSsgMO9SmQX7hTMhAsAV" X-Archives-Salt: 906193c5-92f3-433e-914c-60ead79e3c40 X-Archives-Hash: 83880000f52ae342805b3b207445bc3e This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --------------7dMmHSsgMO9SmQX7hTMhAsAV Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------0v1TAug0QfqFAl20Yy6f08a5"; protected-headers="v1" From: Joonas Niilola To: Sam James Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Handling installed tests References: <87ttftr9ay.fsf@gentoo.org> <87msl98xbt.fsf@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <87msl98xbt.fsf@gentoo.org> --------------0v1TAug0QfqFAl20Yy6f08a5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hey, On 18.8.2024 22.06, Sam James wrote: >=20 > Thoughts on prefix/suffix? >=20 > "test-install", "test-install-files" are more in-keeping with USE=3Dtes= t, > USE=3Dtest-full, etc, but maybe that's *bad* because it's not related > at all to what the ebuild does, so we should do install-* like you've > suggested? >=20 My instant thought was that "install*" prefix is more accurate and easier to understand. But "test*" makes it more consistent with other test-related stuff. No hard opinion either way, I'd prefer "install*" just because it's clearer to me. -- juippis --------------0v1TAug0QfqFAl20Yy6f08a5-- --------------7dMmHSsgMO9SmQX7hTMhAsAV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="OpenPGP_signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="OpenPGP_signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGTBAEBCgB9FiEEltRJ9L6XRmDQCngHc4OUK43AaWIFAmbC0TZfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDk2 RDQ0OUY0QkU5NzQ2NjBEMDBBNzgwNzczODM5NDJCOERDMDY5NjIACgkQc4OUK43A aWJn2QgAsyP79O2jChSEUc2YuR7C1sMfg4rDJY0Of10UZGdo2+EullgBNRy4Hqj2 kJj6KbmKKS58OGqmq9kclez6X3EoaUgyz+H5yAnjPHn1nwvR4Lh66jyRYPaiRkod xBHCOhsD21xzAIOqj1RhAmnlZSsuK6LjFUuu8w9xchNzXyAucWfumi5y+XPLqRAp vjoNFU2s5X3wXeJM99tMmeSQaO9pwfm5mx8dUr5jqW3iU8Zj5QKgAc1vHDLbVSX+ CkorxR9O8QTnGCViE+UhdPJUgHPa9msUADT9BQr83vT1KeskavLkcYoh7Mm7L1EL RS4b/6d5e3TzFBBUJm4oplyG7h/C/w== =QyER -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------7dMmHSsgMO9SmQX7hTMhAsAV--