From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-22942-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
id 1HfXMD-0006C9-38
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 08:23:41 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l3M8MmC2029716;
Sun, 22 Apr 2007 08:22:48 GMT
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l3M8L3tg027472
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 08:21:03 GMT
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2C2B64A9A
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 08:21:02 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.443
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.443 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-1.137,
RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=1.253, SARE_SUB_OBFU_Z=0.327]
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id oE2h0pvYUL8d for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>;
Sun, 22 Apr 2007 08:20:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E57FD64782
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 08:20:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43)
id 1HfXJH-0003W9-V4
for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 10:20:39 +0200
Received: from 82.152.255.232 ([82.152.255.232])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 10:20:39 +0200
Received: from slong by 82.152.255.232 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 10:20:39 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
From: Steve Long <slong@rathaus.eclipse.co.uk>
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Deskzilla for Gentoo
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 09:17:09 +0100
Message-ID: <f0f5s7$r6r$1@sea.gmane.org>
References: <46292B2E.3010902@gentoo.org> <f0e21a$llb$1@sea.gmane.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.152.255.232
User-Agent: KNode/0.10.4
Sender: news <news@sea.gmane.org>
X-Archives-Salt: dd2f7576-e5ad-43bb-ad9a-0f66265f6edf
X-Archives-Hash: 038c870394e44e8fe40967fe551084db
Ryan Hill wrote:
>
> I've been playing with this for about an hour now and it kicks ass.
> Considering i'm offline 5 days a week it's perfect for me.
>
> Thanks :D
>
Man you hooked me too :)
Getting loads of these errors (and dates are wrong of course):
WARNING unparseable timestamp [2002-12-22 01:25:38 0000]
It appears to be gentoo-specific in that the almworks bugs parse ok.
http://bugzilla.almworks.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list