From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HeUZM-0003oq-2m for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 11:12:56 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l3JBBtIT024562; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 11:11:55 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l3JB9lqr021888 for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 11:09:47 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 071F364B1B for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 11:09:47 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: 0.555 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.555 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.698, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=1.253] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6mbHNsNmOL8h for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 11:09:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE65364E21 for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 11:09:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HeUW0-0001np-AV for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:09:28 +0200 Received: from 82.153.79.22 ([82.153.79.22]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:09:28 +0200 Received: from slong by 82.153.79.22 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:09:28 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Steve Long Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: File collisions Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 12:05:54 +0100 Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.153.79.22 User-Agent: KNode/0.10.4 Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: f55f3602-6a91-4361-b787-d38d72f7d180 X-Archives-Hash: 9f010647fdd5fc7181eb498fc738118e Ioannis Aslanidis wrote: > On 4/19/07, Steve Long wrote: >> On the issue of QA, I think enabling FEATURES="collision-detect" by >> default would do a lot more good at this stage than "test". There are >> several packages I have come across where this has picked up files not >> being removed from earlier versions. It's a reasonable default to have >> and doesn't involve delaying users since it takes a fraction of a second >> to carry out. What I'd propose is that portage runs the collision-detect >> and reports it, but continues the installation in the same manner as now. >> >> This could tie into an automated report at a later stage. > > Do you mean to report a 'QA notice' instead of halting the merge? > Well, actually halting the merge is a required feature, so maybe the > QA notice should be added always straightway, not bound to the > FEATURE. > Yes, that's what I meant, sorry for being unclear. The collision-detect should run by default, and report a QA error, only halting if the FEATURE is set. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list