From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HV8mG-0001Wi-SD for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 24 Mar 2007 16:07:37 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l2OG5wCx000614; Sat, 24 Mar 2007 16:05:58 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l2OG2JaD027881 for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2007 16:02:19 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 227166479E for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2007 16:02:19 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: 0.187 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.187 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-1.066, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=1.253] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wLUaF8zLdCW2 for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2007 16:02:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E41264C73 for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2007 16:02:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HV8gr-0004jN-T4 for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Sat, 24 Mar 2007 17:02:01 +0100 Received: from 82.153.72.54 ([82.153.72.54]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2007 17:02:01 +0100 Received: from slong by 82.153.72.54 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2007 17:02:01 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Steve Long Subject: [gentoo-dev] YA_non-technical post about development (was Re: [soc] Python bindings for Paludis) Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 15:58:25 +0000 Message-ID: References: <200703240028.15461.peper@gentoo.org> <200703240150.20710.vapier@gentoo.org> <20070324125451.GF13708@paradox.datanode.net> <200703241430.15651.peper@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.153.72.54 User-Agent: KNode/0.10.4 Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: c61ee886-3eb1-47f6-8492-83552528a5f7 X-Archives-Hash: 8f349e0bec3047ab3a156168d30109a3 Piotr Jaroszy?ski wrote: > On Saturday 24 of March 2007 13:54:51 Michael Cummings wrote: >> Ditto. Gentoo SoC projects need to be for Gentoo developed and sponsored >> code/projects, not third party projects, no matter how much they would >> whither and die without a gentoo core. There was an example of >> gentoo+gnome integration (i think) in a previous email - that wouldn't be >> any more appropriate. Unless there's the Gentoo Inc copyright in the >> header, it isn't eligible in my opinion. <..> > Google seems to concern more about the FOSS community than the > organizations' copyright in the header and imho that's a good thing. > Gentoo is supposed to be a _mentoring_ organization, so the only question > is whether Gentoo mentors are capable of mentoring a project or not. > Umm there clearly isn't any consensus on that last phrase. Other devs appear concerned about Gentoo copyright, which seems reasonable given the requirement to maintain the interests of the distro as a whole. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list