From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HDxzE-0003uU-SA for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2007 07:10:01 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id l1578v95019578; Mon, 5 Feb 2007 07:08:57 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l15778c7017331 for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2007 07:07:08 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F0B364810 for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2007 07:07:08 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -2.56 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.56 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.039, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z9i-SYTJTKVn for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2007 07:07:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BCD764A6F for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2007 07:06:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HDxw7-0004pv-7J for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2007 08:06:47 +0100 Received: from static24-72-114-155.yorkton.accesscomm.ca ([24.72.114.155]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 05 Feb 2007 08:06:47 +0100 Received: from dirtyepic by static24-72-114-155.yorkton.accesscomm.ca with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 05 Feb 2007 08:06:47 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Ryan Hill Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for February Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2007 01:06:35 -0600 Message-ID: References: <20070201103001.74DF064F14@smtp.gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig5D72FCA6108C8ADE3C20A343" X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: static24-72-114-155.yorkton.accesscomm.ca User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0pre (X11/20070203) In-Reply-To: <20070201103001.74DF064F14@smtp.gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.1 OpenPGP: id=837937E8; url=pgp.mit.edu Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: f44f7479-44f2-4bee-9a9c-18453aa8bd56 X-Archives-Hash: 39bcbd76b7c9567d739131a842e58eac This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig5D72FCA6108C8ADE3C20A343 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mike Frysinger wrote: > This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically the > 2nd Thursday at 2000 UTC), same bat channel (#gentoo-council @ > irc.freenode.net) ! Reply-to and SPF docs? Isn't this the third month now? Also the infra doc on dev email still says not to use d.g.o as a relay server. I can't remember if this was first brought up in a council meeting or on core though. Just a friendly poke. ;) --=20 by design, by neglect dirtyepic gentoo org for a fact or just for effect 9B81 6C9F E791 83BB 3AB3 5B2D E625 A073 8379 37E8 (0x837937E8) --------------enig5D72FCA6108C8ADE3C20A343 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFxtd75iWgc4N5N+gRCHRTAJ9n6MlnlKwYyhHC64xn/ysq79mJwACgpd7i IEreLPl4QYELN4wArRD+j9A= =AjPZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig5D72FCA6108C8ADE3C20A343-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list