From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-19992-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
id 1H74u2-00065d-6j
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 07:08:10 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id l0H76opS013499;
Wed, 17 Jan 2007 07:06:51 GMT
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0H746Vi027733
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 07:04:06 GMT
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DE0C645FE
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 07:04:05 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org
X-Spam-Score: -1.112
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.112 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.090,
BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=1.5, TW_BZ=0.077]
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id KyTIk-aR4D9V for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>;
Wed, 17 Jan 2007 07:03:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1332864AE5
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 07:03:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43)
id 1H74pV-0001FI-83
for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 08:03:29 +0100
Received: from 82.152.203.159 ([82.152.203.159])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 08:03:29 +0100
Received: from slong by 82.152.203.159 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 08:03:29 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
From: Steve Long <slong@rathaus.eclipse.co.uk>
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [RFC] Some sync control
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 07:05:21 +0000
Message-ID: <eokhnj$1kv$1@sea.gmane.org>
References: <200701112229.58538.peper@gentoo.org> <45A6B0F7.9060301@gentoo.org> <20070111220839.GC26246@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net> <1168555903.9780.58.camel@localhost> <20070111232257.GE26246@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net> <eoitda$gbm$1@sea.gmane.org> <eojs1o$e14$1@sea.gmane.org> <20070117011012.GB15114@kroah.com> <45AD7DA2.4080700@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.152.203.159
User-Agent: KNode/0.10.4
Sender: news <news@sea.gmane.org>
X-Archives-Salt: 6caab36b-8968-4bfb-ab8c-44cdf69f53f7
X-Archives-Hash: d5f124adbbf5f833fe09df8e10eba6e3
Thanks for the info; git does seem to have issues, going by the `GLEP'. bzr
looks nice, but I don't know enough about it. From what i've read on the ml
and the website it will reach 1.0 in ~March, but has issues eg with
cross-platform development and diff/ commit.
svn seems the most mature of the next-gen tools.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list