From: "Stefan Schmiedl" <s@xss.de>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re[2]: [gentoo-dev] Current unavoidable use of xz utils in Gentoo
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2024 17:13:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <embadec839-3c0f-427d-bf0b-64e25c9774d7@875126df.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d696ac9577fae8e6e3b28aab4e3f4fe0.squirrel@ukinbox.ecrypt.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1916 bytes --]
------ Original Message ------
From "Eddie Chapman" <eddie@ehuk.net>
To gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Date 30.03.2024 16:17:19
Subject Re: [gentoo-dev] Current unavoidable use of xz utils in Gentoo
>Michał Górny wrote:
>> On Sat, 2024-03-30 at 14:57 +0000, Eddie Chapman wrote:
>>
>>> Note, I'm not advocating ripping xz-utils out of tree, all I'm saying
>>> is wouldn't it be nice if there were at least 2 alternatives to choose
>>> from? That doesn't have to be disruptive in any way, people who wish to
>>> continue using and trusting xz-utils should be able to continue to do so
>>> without any friction whatsoever.
>>
>> So, you're basically saying we should go out of our way, recompress all
>> distfiles using two alternative compression formats, increase mirror load
>> four times and add a lot of complexity to ebuilds, right?
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> Michał Górny
>>
>
>Yes that's a very good point, that was something I was wondering in
>weighing up both sides, what the costs would be practically, as I don't
>know the realities of running Gentoo infrastructure. And maybe the costs
>is just too high of a price to pay.
>
>I wonder if increased use of git repos rather than distributed tarballs
>could be part of a solution to those issues, although that could put quite
>a storage burden on every user. Unless they were all shallow git pulls and
>the user could optionally choose to tar up the git directory after clone
>with compression. But yes granted then there is even more ebuild
>complexity.
>
Huh ... I read your original message as
"wouldn't it be nice to have at least 2 alternative [implementations of
xz-utils]
to choose from"
As long as the file format itself is not inherently messed up, the
archives
could stay as .xz, only a "minimal" unxz (similar to unrar) would be
required
to access the contents.
Regards,
s.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4875 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-30 17:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-30 3:07 [gentoo-dev] Current unavoidable use of xz utils in Gentoo Eddie Chapman
2024-03-30 3:43 ` orbea
2024-03-30 7:06 ` Dale
2024-03-30 10:47 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2024-03-30 11:32 ` [gentoo-dev] " Rich Freeman
2024-03-30 14:57 ` Eddie Chapman
2024-03-30 15:02 ` Michał Górny
2024-03-30 15:17 ` Eddie Chapman
2024-03-30 15:29 ` Michał Górny
2024-03-30 15:59 ` Eddie Chapman
2024-03-30 16:07 ` Dale
2024-03-30 17:13 ` Stefan Schmiedl [this message]
2024-03-30 17:36 ` Re[2]: " Eddie Chapman
2024-03-31 1:41 ` Thomas Gall
2024-03-30 23:49 ` Eddie Chapman
2024-03-31 1:36 ` Eli Schwartz
2024-03-30 15:23 ` orbea
2024-03-30 15:14 ` Rich Freeman
2024-03-30 17:19 ` Eddie Chapman
2024-03-31 1:25 ` Sam James
2024-03-31 1:33 ` Eli Schwartz
2024-03-31 11:13 ` Eddie Chapman
2024-03-31 11:59 ` Matt Jolly
2024-04-01 7:57 ` Eddie Chapman
2024-04-01 14:50 ` Eli Schwartz
2024-04-02 8:43 ` Eddie Chapman
2024-04-02 19:46 ` Eli Schwartz
2024-04-02 20:19 ` Eddie Chapman
2024-04-01 14:55 ` Michał Górny
2024-04-02 9:02 ` Eddie Chapman
2024-04-01 15:14 ` Kenton Groombridge
2024-04-01 15:40 ` orbea
2024-04-01 16:01 ` Kenton Groombridge
2024-04-01 16:21 ` orbea
2024-04-01 18:51 ` Kévin GASPARD DE RENEFORT
2024-04-01 20:07 ` James Le Cuirot
2024-04-02 6:32 ` Joonas Niilola
2024-03-31 11:32 ` stefan11111
2024-04-01 14:56 ` Azamat Hackimov
2024-04-02 19:32 ` Eddie Chapman
2024-04-03 11:47 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2024-04-03 12:14 ` Sam James
2024-04-03 15:30 ` [gentoo-dev] " Eddie Chapman
2024-04-03 16:40 ` Michael Orlitzky
2024-04-04 3:20 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2024-04-04 3:49 ` [gentoo-dev] " Eli Schwartz
2024-04-04 8:32 ` Sam James
2024-04-04 8:34 ` Kévin GASPARD DE RENEFORT
2024-04-04 14:38 ` Eddie Chapman
2024-04-04 14:24 ` Eddie Chapman
2024-04-06 11:57 ` Eddie Chapman
2024-04-06 12:15 ` Ulrich Mueller
2024-04-06 12:34 ` Roy Bamford
2024-04-06 14:04 ` Fabian Groffen
2024-04-07 6:44 ` Eddie Chapman
2024-04-06 16:15 ` Sam James
2024-04-07 11:24 ` Eddie Chapman
2024-04-11 5:21 ` Joonas Niilola
2024-04-12 7:18 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2024-04-13 7:10 ` [gentoo-dev] " Eddie Chapman
2024-04-03 12:22 ` [gentoo-dev] " Kévin GASPARD DE RENEFORT
2024-04-03 12:26 ` Kévin GASPARD DE RENEFORT
2024-04-04 1:41 ` Duncan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=embadec839-3c0f-427d-bf0b-64e25c9774d7@875126df.com \
--to=s@xss.de \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox