From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GhR6i-00023I-Sd for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 07 Nov 2006 13:35:17 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id kA7DYC67025950; Tue, 7 Nov 2006 13:34:12 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kA7DWBJx028680 for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2006 13:32:12 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 548BC64663 for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2006 13:32:11 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -2.56 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.56 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.039, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 843wthQEAK-h for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2006 13:32:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0F32644EC for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2006 13:31:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1GhR39-0007hL-Pq for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Tue, 07 Nov 2006 14:31:35 +0100 Received: from ip68-230-97-209.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.230.97.209]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 07 Nov 2006 14:31:35 +0100 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-230-97-209.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 07 Nov 2006 14:31:35 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for November Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 13:31:14 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <20061101134037.6F126649AC@smtp.gentoo.org> <200611061720.50442.vapier@gentoo.org> <20061106223839.GA6332@gentoo.org> <200611061748.34810.vapier@gentoo.org> <1162902277.23009.2.camel@sys947.dtic.mil> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-230-97-209.ph.ph.cox.net User-Agent: pan 0.118 (Gustaf Von Musterhausen) Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: da7bd9c1-1b55-4a71-8637-5a2b782f2b32 X-Archives-Hash: 7656bac6936d26fdf3e78f4fb396b041 Michael Cummings posted 1162902277.23009.2.camel@sys947.dtic.mil, excerpted below, on Tue, 07 Nov 2006 07:24:37 -0500: > Not an option for everyone without a lot of needless hoop jumping, like > ssh port forwarding. Cox (rhyme it as you will), my cable provider, > doesn't allow 25 to leave their network. To send mail, I *have* to relay > through their mail servers. This is of interest to me since I'm on Cox too (tho of course not a dev so no gentoo address to worry about). Gentoo doesn't do SSMTP? Or your client of choice doesn't (I've not had to worry about it so honestly don't know what *ix clients do or don't). IIRC, Lance did say something in his post about contacting him if another port was necessary. That's the standard solution suggested to folks on Cox, as Cox is primarily interested in blocking spambots, and legit mail just gets caught in the cross-hairs. They don't care about third party mail as long as it's not on port 25, which the spambots of course use. Thus, no fancy encryption or the like needed, only a server listening on something other than 25, and a client that can be set to send on something other than 25. -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list