From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27859 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2004 13:26:29 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 22 Jul 2004 13:26:29 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Bndae-0002fQ-3k for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 13:26:28 +0000 Received: (qmail 13690 invoked by uid 89); 22 Jul 2004 13:26:23 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 24519 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2004 13:26:22 +0000 Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 09:26:30 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 (Generated by Pantomime 1.2.0) From: Armando Di Cianno To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <200407211902.06366.lv@gentoo.org> X-Image-URL: http://armando.xylite.com/images/me64x64.tiff X-Mailer: GNUMail.app (Version 1.2.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: stitching GNUstep into portage (resend: corrupted for some) X-Archives-Salt: c87bf8af-33f8-4023-8a04-4a96828b770b X-Archives-Hash: 83246ff8981fcf4c04a3a0c7542627f2 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2004-07-21 19:02:06 -0400 Travis Tilley wrote: > i'd like for libffi to be the default if possible, since it's > required for > gnustep to work with hardened at all, or on archs like the one i > happen to > use. also, isnt ffcall unmainained? There's a good chance that ffcall is, for all intents and purposes, unmaintained, although people do still regularly use it. Libffi is a little less "popular", but for our ends, it is really the only choice. Sadly, the gcc build process doesn't compile it unless java and c++ are enabled, but if the target is only "install-target-libffi", it only increased the build time from 1 minute to 7, and not to ~35 minutes for the entire gcc w/ java. Does anyone know if the different arch testing machines available can host remote X sessions? If so, I really should get in touch with the maintainer of the amd64 machine, and get to the root of the issues with the GNUstep core library and amd64. So far, gdb backtraces on that arch have died in the same function, so I'm crossing my fingers it remains only that one. __Armando Di Cianno -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using the GPG bundle for GNUMail.app iD8DBQFA/8CFwgiTPLI9xhcRAjxFAJ9q3l3KinQMuqEHFw+RrAxg/z3Q6QCfdY2L 8GaUVIi+GqjxKbDSmMCjes4= =yCbM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list