From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GRbiD-0003Fj-RQ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:40:34 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k8OLd4wx027802; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:39:04 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8OLYJRc022277 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:34:20 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 732D06461A for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:34:19 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -2.53 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.53 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.069, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3rRr+J+xFkOV for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:34:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77B3364956 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:34:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1GRbbu-0006Bf-TW for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:34:02 +0200 Received: from static24-72-113-20.yorkton.accesscomm.ca ([24.72.113.20]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:34:02 +0200 Received: from dirtyepic.sk by static24-72-113-20.yorkton.accesscomm.ca with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:34:02 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Ryan Hill Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 52 - GLEP 23 revisited Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:37:09 -0600 Message-ID: References: <451127AB.4060202@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig23D2D87936D024E77A7B2BCD" X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: static24-72-113-20.yorkton.accesscomm.ca User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0b1pre (X11/20060923) In-Reply-To: <451127AB.4060202@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.1 OpenPGP: id=9232ECA5 Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 43210aec-07a6-4454-820b-2c71ed854a4d X-Archives-Hash: 70eaedf7d1d858730fe22e6a18e5a378 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig23D2D87936D024E77A7B2BCD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Simon Stelling wrote: > Hello all, >=20 > I would like you to share your comments on the attached GLEP with me. >=20 > Thanks in advance! I think I agree with the others. Excellent idea though; thanks for giving this issue your attention. --de. --------------enig23D2D87936D024E77A7B2BCD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFFvqKyrvh8ZIy7KURCBMJAKCQLYspBf97kVT81rHvUDm6jdNkrQCg8HsT yoCtAumvqAih/50psNiKtbA= =XnlJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig23D2D87936D024E77A7B2BCD-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list