From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GQmTg-0008MZ-Ci for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 14:58:08 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k8MEvFxS013653; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 14:57:15 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8MEsd9j018568 for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 14:54:48 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64B9965004 for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 14:16:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19419-11 for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 14:16:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D26E65009 for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 14:16:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1GQloJ-0006Z5-UE for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 16:15:24 +0200 Received: from pool-70-17-41-152.pskn.east.verizon.net ([70.17.41.152]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 16:15:23 +0200 Received: from sw98234 by pool-70-17-41-152.pskn.east.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 16:15:23 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: "Peter" Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: seeds, GLEPs, and projects Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 14:14:21 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <20060921175501.GI25921@feynman.corp.halliburton.com> <4512D9DE.9050405@gentoo.org> <20060921213418.48a9a9fb@snowdrop.home> <4512FACC.3080306@gentoo.org> <20060922100616.49da59be@mk65-desktop.pioto.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-70-17-41-152.pskn.east.verizon.net X-Archive: encrypt User-Agent: pan 0.112 (Elijah Craig) Sender: news X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.43 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.007, BAYES_00=-2.599, FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2=1.162] X-Spam-Score: -1.43 X-Spam-Level: X-Archives-Salt: f83e12e7-03a7-4089-9082-ca69ca053ce2 X-Archives-Hash: 6243b19c8c583cd8ec62510619f753e7 On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 10:06:16 -0400, Mike Kelly wrote: > On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 21:43:16 +0000 (UTC) > "Peter" wrote: > >> That's a laugh! Problem is that no devs seem to get approved in a >> timely fashion. And, any potential devs would be rather turned off by >> the goings on here. You guys seem to try and stifle innovation at >> every turn -- trying to turn Gentoo into GLEPtoo. Instead of >> progress, you have arguments. Instead of innovation, you have >> arguments. Instead of new blood, you lose people. > > Hi, not so. I've just joined on as a dev, my recruitment process > happened in a timely fashion. After I passed all my quizzes, I became a > dev. I think we also had at least 3 other new folks in the past few > weeks, and maybe 1 person leaving. > Not timely. Incredibly fast. I've never seen a one week soup to nuts developer approval. However, others still languish. See bz. -- Peter -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list