From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7076B138334 for ; Sat, 21 Sep 2019 19:57:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DF6EBE0954; Sat, 21 Sep 2019 19:57:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96D74E0920 for ; Sat, 21 Sep 2019 19:57:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiot (c134-66.icpnet.pl [85.221.134.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D98BB34B268; Sat, 21 Sep 2019 19:57:29 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Adding 'GPL-2-only', 'GPL-3-only' etc. license variants for better auditing From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: licenses Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2019 21:57:25 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20190921192655.GA8415@linux1.home> References: <20190921192655.GA8415@linux1.home> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Opt2IkG9J/kRWhmC89qv" User-Agent: Evolution 3.32.4 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: 8b3e6f8f-ee45-4f21-a3c5-488d72d8e85e X-Archives-Hash: 2eb769f624454e17665c1a4307ba5426 --=-Opt2IkG9J/kRWhmC89qv Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2019-09-21 at 14:26 -0500, William Hubbs wrote: > On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 09:17:53PM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > > > > > On Sat, 21 Sep 2019, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > > > TL;DR: I'd like to replace 'GPL-2' with 'GPL-2-only' etc., having > > > the former trigger QA warning asking the dev to double-check if it's > > > 'GPL-2-only' or 'GPL-2+'. > >=20 > > This has been discussed before. There is no such license as GPL-2-only. >=20 > I am with ulm on this one. > We have GPL-2 and GPL-2+ in the tree. The way I read this, > LICENSE=3D"GPL-2" means GPL 2 only and LICENSE=3D"GPL-2+" means GPL-2+. >=20 Have you read my original mail? --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --=-Opt2IkG9J/kRWhmC89qv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGTBAABCgB9FiEEx2qEUJQJjSjMiybFY5ra4jKeJA4FAl2GgKVfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEM3 NkE4NDUwOTQwOThEMjhDQzhCMjZDNTYzOUFEQUUyMzI5RTI0MEUACgkQY5ra4jKe JA53YQgAjmTbDtglHqzVXLoZCM4hMxXE08bFiEPLFBq6QpJtXjpXzRclYYbUGHqu HP/BH+JadCFKgm0sIuy4YGeYhtNU1rZYw59K6t/jend8AoLJwu8QoiG41UkbZlbj SwFLZ2XBw1DSLeEfBaZ7g9takDNwWjywvXUyn5ivymWuiYrC1n5jGUN3N+H9GlPA tKAgTwDP+12e/7X5w0s+XjanQ5Dx2KsG2oP1V99IkDeH3/VsBJxQrlPiCOvMoHyl tzouKQc4GwzYwyAOtzeYbluiMRGPS/XC3w91bpXGfrPULNBX6gwUg6EN9EnEHbW0 adPoEBbNtV7G3oBtqaQqQzkTOrCDpQ== =27kW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-Opt2IkG9J/kRWhmC89qv--