From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GK5pa-00020i-Gm for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 04 Sep 2006 04:13:06 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k844CRa6032560; Mon, 4 Sep 2006 04:12:27 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8448xA0015764 for ; Mon, 4 Sep 2006 04:09:12 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65B4665468 for ; Mon, 4 Sep 2006 01:06:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12942-15 for ; Mon, 4 Sep 2006 01:06:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71CB16563D for ; Mon, 4 Sep 2006 01:05:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1GK1nz-000576-MM for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Mon, 04 Sep 2006 01:55:11 +0200 Received: from static24-72-114-127.yorkton.accesscomm.ca ([24.72.114.127]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 04 Sep 2006 01:55:11 +0200 Received: from dirtyepic.sk by static24-72-114-127.yorkton.accesscomm.ca with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 04 Sep 2006 01:55:11 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Ryan Hill Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: packages going into the tree with non-gentoo maintainers Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2006 17:54:33 -0600 Message-ID: References: <20060903112049.29f5026e@c1358217.kevquinn.com> <200609031555.32262.pauldv@gentoo.org> <20060903204616.2a25695d@c1358217.kevquinn.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: static24-72-114-127.yorkton.accesscomm.ca User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0a1 (X11/20060902) In-Reply-To: <20060903204616.2a25695d@c1358217.kevquinn.com> Sender: news X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.538 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.061, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.538 X-Spam-Level: X-Archives-Salt: 9224a147-b374-432d-ba96-c284a1bb32d9 X-Archives-Hash: a57473b7cb5731ee4088ed1ac11eb51c Kevin F. Quinn wrote: > If you don't care whether a package is stable or not, just let the arch > team go ahead and do what they need to do to stabilise when they wish > to. The role of package maintainer has nothing to do with > stabilisation, which is the preserve of the arch teams. Um, sure it does. We're not going to stabilize something without attempting to contact the maintainer first. If it's maintainer-needed we'll just go ahead though. --de. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list