From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3A211396D9 for ; Sat, 21 Oct 2017 02:08:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C71042BC068; Sat, 21 Oct 2017 02:08:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A6D52BC031 for ; Sat, 21 Oct 2017 02:08:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.2.102] (ipservice-092-214-194-142.092.214.pools.vodafone-ip.de [92.214.194.142]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: chithanh) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EB65433BE18 for ; Sat, 21 Oct 2017 02:08:05 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Manifest2 hashes, take n+1-th To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <1508440120.19870.14.camel@gentoo.org> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Ch=c3=ad-Thanh_Christopher_Nguy=e1=bb=85n?= Message-ID: Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2017 04:08:40 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0 SeaMonkey/2.49.4.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1508440120.19870.14.camel@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 3896a909-283c-494c-972d-afb68a8ab6e2 X-Archives-Hash: 873144d8cb976c195e8d6a39033de968 Michał Górny schrieb: > to: > > manifest-hashes = SHA512 SHA3_512 +1 Just wondering about the performance argument on weak systems: Does Portage absolutely have to check all of the hashes or can it be configured by the user to check only a subset of them? Best regards, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn