El jue, 23-12-2021 a las 17:46 -0500, Matt Turner escribió:
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 4:36 PM tastytea <gentoo@tastytea.de> wrote:
> > I think “secret” may be too generic and “libsecret” is not ideal in case
> > an implemention comes along that is named differently. How about
> > “secret-service”?
> 
> I think this is a good idea.
> 

And "keyring"? I am not sure if users not familiar with "libsecret" will
understand what "secret*" means in this context