From: Daniel Campbell <zlg@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New Working Group established to evaluate the stable tree
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 23:33:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ec89c2f3-ab67-4204-9dfb-70d284a182b6@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20506a08-5c7f-245b-fc98-849b6055c6f6@gentoo.org>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1153 bytes --]
On 08/15/2016 03:21 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> Better than developers marking it fixed without it hitting stable as too
> many are doing today.
Totally guilty of that one, sorry!
I think adding a status would be great. We could have CONFIRMED and even
RESOLVED still, but the goalpost could be moved to CONFIRMED/STABLE
instead of CONFIRMED/RESOLVED. Pushing the fix to git can still resolve
a problem, but the STABLE status would mean that the package that fixed
the bug then hit stable.
The problem with this, however, is that it turns every bug into the
subject of the bug *and* a stabilization bug. Are we to get rid of
stabilization bugs altogether? Or do we keep stabilization bugs and
merely update all the dependent bugs to CONFIRMED/STABLE once
stabilization happens?
A workflow suggestion would be great, because I care about fixing my
bugs and getting them to users as fast as what's reasonable.
(That said I have a busy weekend ahead of me with lighttpd...)
--
Daniel Campbell - Gentoo Developer
OpenPGP Key: 0x1EA055D6 @ hkp://keys.gnupg.net
fpr: AE03 9064 AE00 053C 270C 1DE4 6F7A 9091 1EA0 55D6
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-18 6:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-14 21:35 [gentoo-dev] New Working Group established to evaluate the stable tree Kristian Fiskerstrand
2016-08-14 21:45 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2016-08-14 21:49 ` Kristian Fiskerstrand
2016-08-14 21:49 ` Kent Fredric
2016-08-14 21:52 ` M. J. Everitt
2016-08-14 22:06 ` Chris Reffett
2016-08-14 21:50 ` Anthony G. Basile
2016-08-14 21:57 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2016-08-14 22:01 ` Kent Fredric
2016-08-15 19:18 ` Andreas K. Hüttel
2016-08-15 19:19 ` Michael Orlitzky
2016-08-15 3:45 ` Jason Zaman
2016-08-15 3:53 ` Kent Fredric
2016-08-15 4:05 ` Jason Zaman
2016-08-15 7:55 ` Brian Dolbec
2016-08-15 8:50 ` Kent Fredric
2016-08-15 10:21 ` Kristian Fiskerstrand
2016-08-18 6:33 ` Daniel Campbell [this message]
2016-08-15 13:40 ` Rich Freeman
2016-08-15 15:48 ` Brian Dolbec
2016-08-15 4:29 ` #wg-stable: Reservations about a "STABLE" & "NeedsStable" bugzilla keywords (re: [gentoo-dev] New Working Group established to evaluate the stable tree) Kent Fredric
2016-08-15 4:37 ` Kent Fredric
2016-08-15 12:22 ` james
2016-08-15 12:49 ` Dirkjan Ochtman
2016-08-15 13:03 ` Kristian Fiskerstrand
2016-08-15 13:15 ` Dirkjan Ochtman
2016-08-15 13:25 ` Kristian Fiskerstrand
2016-08-15 14:28 ` james
2016-08-15 18:24 ` Dirkjan Ochtman
2016-08-15 19:30 ` Andreas K. Hüttel
2016-08-15 19:42 ` Rich Freeman
2016-08-21 0:30 ` Daniel Campbell
2016-10-04 17:25 ` Ian Stakenvicius
2016-10-07 2:40 ` Daniel Campbell
2016-08-15 23:00 ` Kent Fredric
2016-08-15 22:50 ` Kent Fredric
2016-08-15 8:00 ` [gentoo-dev] New Working Group established to evaluate the stable tree Pacho Ramos
2016-08-15 8:15 ` Pacho Ramos
2016-08-15 14:19 ` William Hubbs
2016-08-15 14:49 ` Kristian Fiskerstrand
2016-08-15 14:50 ` Kristian Fiskerstrand
2016-08-15 16:12 ` William Hubbs
2016-08-15 17:31 ` William Hubbs
2016-08-15 18:33 ` Rich Freeman
2016-08-15 19:12 ` William Hubbs
2016-08-15 19:27 ` Rich Freeman
2016-08-15 20:01 ` William Hubbs
2016-08-15 20:05 ` Rich Freeman
2016-08-16 8:02 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2016-08-16 13:52 ` William Hubbs
2016-08-17 8:52 ` [gentoo-dev] " Pacho Ramos
2016-08-17 8:50 ` Pacho Ramos
2016-08-17 13:07 ` Rich Freeman
2016-08-17 14:25 ` Pacho Ramos
2016-08-18 7:32 ` Raymond Jennings
2016-08-15 11:36 ` Kristian Fiskerstrand
2016-08-15 12:24 ` Michael Orlitzky
2016-08-15 13:37 ` Rich Freeman
2016-08-15 23:19 ` Kent Fredric
2016-08-15 19:33 ` Markus Meier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ec89c2f3-ab67-4204-9dfb-70d284a182b6@gentoo.org \
--to=zlg@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox