From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-38043-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1MxOMC-00079g-65
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:06:48 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 40EE9E0818;
	Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:06:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-bw0-f211.google.com (mail-bw0-f211.google.com [209.85.218.211])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D61B0E0818
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:06:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by bwz7 with SMTP id 7so3402071bwz.34
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:06:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
         :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
        bh=39CxQ4Se1jrmEniS9BjETtTZfXivpwvvfQ2sytXHE5Y=;
        b=HVBS24Kb+15jfVe3BqnsvgpCVsISGqxvXIYiyvhty+XpjUpbukvOeUolN26wzBBA8h
         RgSImV1Y8Xc3bck4UktIJGsmQ3aQsfG4JzoLTcEGRYzAGyt87TrabPcj75NCR8BSnAhP
         mDt4owSse+0KGr2S2OWZh6eubb9/JXlziFeSc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        b=E0DKS8Y53uxc78Zt32GsXhLH3Q/H+/IqVxU0jLjjrtorpSktHheH1mReg3zD9Oj0j0
         Z9crD6IHwUZ/r3VmdYcublQ2NFngeR5Q6XBoFntrogEOZbg4XC2EX4jbXXmgGZ0sxKzf
         apnP7LS37iVyQn297Fjq6qvXuKE4WLNqAt11E=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.7.195 with SMTP id e3mr5308697bke.118.1255367206149; Mon, 
	12 Oct 2009 10:06:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <173442fb4ce538d8895eb52554f0b780@localhost>
References: <20091012093942.08ef453a@dante> <deaa866a0910120945j2ebc3a35pa0cf197670e3f67e@mail.gmail.com> 
	<173442fb4ce538d8895eb52554f0b780@localhost>
From: Wyatt Epp <wyatt.epp@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:06:26 -0400
Message-ID: <eb9225a70910121006l3cd65ac5wa8d023154f65762d@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Init systems portage category
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00151750e950629e770475bff4fd
X-Archives-Salt: e25cd8b1-ff2b-407b-b40b-516b2420675a
X-Archives-Hash: 6e73055bf4841078b953f438ab659edc

--00151750e950629e770475bff4fd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

2009/10/12 Jes=C3=BAs Guerrero <i92guboj@terra.es>

>  But there's one... That what the "system" set is about in first place. W=
e
> could argue if creating a new category would be any good or not, that's a
> different issue. But there's already a list of packages that's considered
> critical for a Gentoo system. That's what "system" is, and you will get a
> big red waning when trying to uninstall one package belonging to this
> category.
>
>
Seeing as we understand @system to be "critical for a functional Gentoo
system", the phrase "critical packages" may have been poorly chosen for
communicating the concept of "things that, should I be cavalier in playing
with them, may leave me with a system that is incapable of playing again
without intervention from one of those lovely LiveCD things".

Nevertheless, there is a class of "packages that I need to watch out for,
because they'll make my life miserable in ways X can only dream about and
THEN stab me in the kidneys with a rusty javelin if I'm not careful" under
discussion that could probably use some action.  It's unfortunate that
there's no good way of encoding arbitrary semantic metadata about a small
set of packages such that it can be leveraged by various sources to achieve
this end...

Regards,
Wyatt

--00151750e950629e770475bff4fd
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">2009/10/12 Jes=C3=BAs Guerrero <span dir=3D"ltr"=
>&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:i92guboj@terra.es">i92guboj@terra.es</a>&gt;</span><=
br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(20=
4, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">

<div><div></div><div class=3D"h5">
</div></div>But there&#39;s one... That what the &quot;system&quot; set is =
about in first place. We<br>
could argue if creating a new category would be any good or not, that&#39;s=
 a<br>
different issue. But there&#39;s already a list of packages that&#39;s cons=
idered<br>
critical for a Gentoo system. That&#39;s what &quot;system&quot; is, and yo=
u will get a<br>
big red waning when trying to uninstall one package belonging to this<br>
category.<br>
=C2=A0<br></blockquote><div>Seeing as we understand @system to be &quot;cri=
tical for a functional Gentoo system&quot;, the phrase &quot;critical packa=
ges&quot; may have been poorly chosen for communicating the concept of &quo=
t;things that, should I be cavalier in playing with them, may leave me with=
 a system that is incapable of playing again without intervention from one =
of those lovely LiveCD things&quot;.<br>

<br>Nevertheless, there is a class of &quot;packages that I need to watch o=
ut for, because they&#39;ll make my life miserable in ways X can only dream=
 about and THEN stab me in the kidneys with a rusty javelin if I&#39;m not =
careful&quot; under discussion that could probably use some action.=C2=A0 I=
t&#39;s unfortunate that there&#39;s no good way of encoding arbitrary sema=
ntic metadata about a small set of packages such that it can be leveraged b=
y various sources to achieve this end...<br>

<br>Regards,<br>Wyatt<br></div></div>

--00151750e950629e770475bff4fd--