From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1G7QHd-0004kL-Nv for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 05:25:42 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k6V5OoUF016284; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 05:24:50 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k6V5MmPq031842 for ; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 05:22:48 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 134BE643E4 for ; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 05:22:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20185-18 for ; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 05:22:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2C26644C0 for ; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 05:22:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1G7QEg-0007U2-3F for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 07:22:38 +0200 Received: from static24-72-114-127.yorkton.accesscomm.ca ([24.72.114.127]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 07:22:38 +0200 Received: from dirtyepic.sk by static24-72-114-127.yorkton.accesscomm.ca with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 07:22:38 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Ryan Hill Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Resignation Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 23:22:33 -0600 Message-ID: References: <1154314231.11516.10.camel@localhost> <20060731040614.5ec4b176@snowdrop.home> <200607302332.28056.brettholcomb@bellsouth.net> <20060731052751.0dc06ec2@snowdrop.home> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: static24-72-114-127.yorkton.accesscomm.ca User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060728) In-Reply-To: <20060731052751.0dc06ec2@snowdrop.home> Sender: news X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.539 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.060, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.539 X-Spam-Level: X-Archives-Salt: 68f75ab7-abb1-4ef5-9f6b-f666105e5ab1 X-Archives-Hash: 770a107908742b97e78a2eb6758781c1 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 23:20:16 -0500 "Alex Tarkovsky" > | This "no QA" accusation is a complete myth. QA led by actual Gentoo > | developers is indeed in place at Sunrise [1]. > Did you look at *which* actual Gentoo developers are on the list? You know, that was a completely unnecessary personal attack. God forbid anyone take the time to attempt something they think may be beneficial to the community. If you in all your elitist wisdom think you can do better then try helping out. If not, then please fuck off. > Even that aside, if a couple of hundred developers can't handle doing > QA for all those maintainer-wanted ebuilds, what makes you think four > people can? If a couple of hundred developers actually paid any attention whatsoever to maintainer-wanted ebuilds then there wouldn't have to be any such project in the first place. --de. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list