From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N9YQM-000263-Vs for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 15 Nov 2009 06:17:23 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 85576E0A45 for ; Sun, 15 Nov 2009 06:17:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pw0-f47.google.com (mail-pw0-f47.google.com [209.85.160.47]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37927E07C9; Sun, 15 Nov 2009 04:37:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pwi9 with SMTP id 9so2896042pwi.26 for ; Sat, 14 Nov 2009 20:37:01 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cardoe@cardoe.com Received: by 10.142.55.20 with SMTP id d20mr664793wfa.37.1258259821650; Sat, 14 Nov 2009 20:37:01 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 22:37:01 -0600 X-Google-Sender-Auth: e58b09f7d63c1a62 Message-ID: Subject: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 27 Bump From: Doug Goldstein To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, gentoo-dev-announce@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: ac7f8ddf-0ecc-40cf-b2c2-9155995bb26c X-Archives-Hash: 964b8f2933cf573c5a2cce1bfbbc0f1e GLEP 27 [1] seems pretty stagnant and I'm planning on giving it a bit of a refresh and actually implementing it. Now before I do this I'm not in love with the format in tree but I haven't decided on a format exactly in my head. So that being said, I'm sending this out looking for some opinions or ideas for my new GLEP. One of the obvious things I'll cover is all the ambiguity of the GLEP with regard to the data inside each of the files. [1] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0027.html -- Doug Goldstein