From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-39865-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1No0WS-00063i-CC
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2010 20:22:52 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 803C8E0C6E;
Sat, 6 Mar 2010 20:22:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ew0-f215.google.com (mail-ew0-f215.google.com [209.85.219.215])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4FF8E0C0B
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 6 Mar 2010 20:22:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by ewy7 with SMTP id 7so872116ewy.29
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 06 Mar 2010 12:22:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=A9TLrVjjum+WwwIjXwxF2GTZeQlNCu2+0MDHwhuVz5c=;
b=P5WNJwEaXCrTn+BKRUyziezU3IZ+oIiKW0CjBQGlOGJBK7LA/CEXsN5NbDu5iJvEtm
gkfTd/MXSfFgw2/HqT3MXQCKhY3Vku2K5xnOtIesoq9W90ilHpB1VcijRfjUNaB09q3l
Y0GX//ZDYGndIfT9LMiynx7p8truA6XdEz8jw=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type;
b=nAtjd5Ay7fs5FSGWO4hXPp3KiRYUlrP+bIZV32Ej+dS1yWyZ+RSxJ49LUPcxjh/Kgp
FGQ00CMkPI2MeOwK6sJbwt/Bl5Rtns/2cTZzXE+U9UHNreazKiTE2vIMf750eYEEnqrS
sLH5IqVBRIslBZbaaFwjTo6f+aV83FskPBS+k=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.213.96.221 with SMTP id i29mr1768157ebn.99.1267906951616; Sat,
06 Mar 2010 12:22:31 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <201003061909.29222.levertond@googlemail.com>
References: <4B889D1F.3040304@gentoo.org> <201003061545.06522.rbu@gentoo.org>
<ea440b1d1003060726r5c0549e8kc0e6af144ba2cd04@mail.gmail.com>
<201003061909.29222.levertond@googlemail.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2010 21:22:31 +0100
Message-ID: <ea440b1d1003061222s16c6849dr758388528e146bae@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Marking bugs for bugday?
From: Ioannis Aslanidis <aslanidis@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: 1fcba8ef-af93-4e08-a409-a7c21e64311b
X-Archives-Hash: f80c0a4b0185a291131607da1cdee865
Now that's what I wanted. Thanks!
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 8:09 PM, David Leverton <levertond@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Saturday 06 March 2010 15:26:10 Ioannis Aslanidis wrote:
>> Well, I personally would prefer to have two keywords at least, one for
>> candidates and another for confirmed bugs.
>
> This sounds like the sort of thing Bugzilla's "flags" mechanism is for.
>
> http://www.bugzilla.org/docs/2.22/html/flags-overview.html
>
>
--
Ioannis Aslanidis
http://www.deathwing00.org
<deathwing00[at]gentoo.org> 0x47F370A0