From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Nnvte-0002YU-8f for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2010 15:26:30 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 11EB1E0CDA; Sat, 6 Mar 2010 15:26:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f215.google.com (mail-ew0-f215.google.com [209.85.219.215]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F388E0C56 for ; Sat, 6 Mar 2010 15:26:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy7 with SMTP id 7so806322ewy.29 for ; Sat, 06 Mar 2010 07:26:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=dF/oXGEGNOKbQ+DY+fns+vQBQf0nOBO66WWMZkxpzPs=; b=PoXwvol6VAJkCj0hsTCk+myF692Xxkkzw7y8KKHidUi1qOwkH1i2cj7gMMSv1OsumP e3bkHmr5cr9eIa8kFQtBgrH+FG3hZ56McaRi6bX0EFZuna6AcFk+eZSnqJdFdvaTlhA5 nQCmPAgE868EVF62b67UXnygf1QBOmPawWXEA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=BLSowB21mRhbr2TT8iCsx97s4wK4J86VGRivx2g5UTAEE8h69VIl6cFAP7Fw67aE3q kR85KSfJGHP4I6ZSFbx+JuQkJKaBpGqvuNeaDi58Y16iGNL+sE0Zu+vY3C51d8itkZmT cVnmXwEFu3RNfKpJkBngbstnRW3ekxZSMFSic= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.97.28 with SMTP id j28mr1472126ebn.82.1267889170710; Sat, 06 Mar 2010 07:26:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201003061545.06522.rbu@gentoo.org> References: <4B889D1F.3040304@gentoo.org> <4B8D66E3.9000103@gentoo.org> <4B8D6973.1070900@gentoo.org> <201003061545.06522.rbu@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2010 16:26:10 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Marking bugs for bugday? From: Ioannis Aslanidis To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 9a620348-fc91-45c2-81f6-56adde87a00e X-Archives-Hash: fc30e59c811e8599c47e8b7b8a27a1e8 Well, I personally would prefer to have two keywords at least, one for candidates and another for confirmed bugs. Otherwise it will be a real trouble for us to sort things out. If adding more than one keywords breaks anything, then I can tell you now it is already broken. The only thing that could make me thing that one keyword is enough, is that an actual comment is added every time a keyword is being added or removed off a bug, to be able to keep track of these changes. On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Robert Buchholz wrote: > On Tuesday 02 March 2010, Sebastian Pipping wrote: >> On 03/02/10 20:28, Nathan Zachary wrote: >> >> This looks like overkill to me. One keyword should be enough, and >> >> for supplementary information "Status Whiteboard" could be used. >> > >> > I agree. =C2=A0Simply having the BUGDAY keyword should be sufficient, >> > and more information can be provided elsewhere in the report. >> >> If more than one keyword is commonly considered overkill I would at >> least request the whiteboard for it: "somewhere in the report" >> =C2=A0involves more than zero searching for it. > > Some people use the whiteboard for their own marking of bugs (e.g. > security, and myself). If you add more information in there, you might > be breaking other people's marking / sorting algorithms. > > I'd say one keyword BUGDAY is enough. Any bug editor can set and remove > it and the bug history will show who set and removed it when. Sorting > any syntax is taken care of by Bugzilla that way. It seems to me problem > you seem to try to solve (review of bugs) can also be tackled with tools > displaying new bugs that have the keyword set and just removing the > keyword. If bugs are repeatedly spammed with BUGDAY comments, talk to > the spammers or leave a comment. > > > > Robert > --=20 Ioannis Aslanidis http://www.deathwing00.org 0x47F370A0