From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NmGXG-0001ZU-LD for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 01:04:31 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 489B2E0DEE for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 01:04:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f222.google.com (mail-ew0-f222.google.com [209.85.219.222]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F403FE0671 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 00:15:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy22 with SMTP id 22so2190502ewy.26 for ; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 16:15:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=bTHcZZ0T9T6637OWgVUoBPt66Yk/WCkTe41gk9eW5pE=; b=loDpifZhy2wAAv4QzEphwxfgtRbLSNji7WVlXaY25yTho9Aowez/jaXQpkyBLyEbML n/T0gKTYOswDVjvwhyX0P0tzsXHam+NmCQBYtCl6M96is8V+hqO0bmBnEmyFJW+tBJ8x ZKqOfkl22ziPmiovbsGifY+JqsvsWIEWDlWvg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=c+ruYB7jFDR8tI0if1FhPOJ/Sdf3gIWWhQ7vbP6Fqo78eEcGVczkfpSqY59SoMvHMs 37WM/pctLE9JsHSqPYyvj7P6igreKzjozIBcwi6XtZjg2O2Z9traOlsf9oAXYASU2w2M 7i1ATe4HKvcNsCkBDMWirPJc3OIewqJ1Yp27A= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.38.3 with SMTP id z3mr3878135ebd.69.1267488950133; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 16:15:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20100302010205.18765d7s0e4x781s@webmail.df.eu> References: <4B889D1F.3040304@gentoo.org> <201002282154.35130.hwoarang@gentoo.org> <4B8ACC34.7000600@gentoo.org> <20100228173504.78eea0b1@angelstorm> <20100302010205.18765d7s0e4x781s@webmail.df.eu> Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 01:15:50 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Marking bugs for bugday? From: Ioannis Aslanidis To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: 9a9e2d30-c8fa-43e7-af91-f6e4eb8f4178 X-Archives-Hash: c607af90413fccd9fb3caa52e9fa2f3e That sounds great! On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 1:02 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote: > > Quoting Ioannis Aslanidis : >> >> I would prefer to keep the keyword for >> Bugday Members to administer. > > I don't think that sending mails would work well. > If you want extra control/QA for bugday team members > I would propose two different keywords: one for bugday > candidates and one for confirmed bugday bugs. > > Any dev could mark bugs as candidates easily and without > delays while you could still reserve acknoledgement to you. > > > > Sebastian > > > > > -- Ioannis Aslanidis http://www.deathwing00.org 0x47F370A0