From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-39637-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1NmGXG-0001ZU-LD
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 01:04:31 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 489B2E0DEE
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 01:04:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ew0-f222.google.com (mail-ew0-f222.google.com [209.85.219.222])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F403FE0671
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 00:15:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by ewy22 with SMTP id 22so2190502ewy.26
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 16:15:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=bTHcZZ0T9T6637OWgVUoBPt66Yk/WCkTe41gk9eW5pE=;
b=loDpifZhy2wAAv4QzEphwxfgtRbLSNji7WVlXaY25yTho9Aowez/jaXQpkyBLyEbML
n/T0gKTYOswDVjvwhyX0P0tzsXHam+NmCQBYtCl6M96is8V+hqO0bmBnEmyFJW+tBJ8x
ZKqOfkl22ziPmiovbsGifY+JqsvsWIEWDlWvg=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type;
b=c+ruYB7jFDR8tI0if1FhPOJ/Sdf3gIWWhQ7vbP6Fqo78eEcGVczkfpSqY59SoMvHMs
37WM/pctLE9JsHSqPYyvj7P6igreKzjozIBcwi6XtZjg2O2Z9traOlsf9oAXYASU2w2M
7i1ATe4HKvcNsCkBDMWirPJc3OIewqJ1Yp27A=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.213.38.3 with SMTP id z3mr3878135ebd.69.1267488950133; Mon, 01
Mar 2010 16:15:50 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20100302010205.18765d7s0e4x781s@webmail.df.eu>
References: <4B889D1F.3040304@gentoo.org>
<201002282154.35130.hwoarang@gentoo.org> <4B8ACC34.7000600@gentoo.org>
<20100228173504.78eea0b1@angelstorm>
<ea440b1d1003011317j24a550b2id2653d8061757c94@mail.gmail.com>
<e117dbb91003011419if3b25fnef03dc6c0e86e69d@mail.gmail.com>
<ea440b1d1003011426hdc97dc4p55666fa51f34bcee@mail.gmail.com>
<20100302010205.18765d7s0e4x781s@webmail.df.eu>
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 01:15:50 +0100
Message-ID: <ea440b1d1003011615h54be8c26ie3ef58bf2b2f1db7@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Marking bugs for bugday?
From: Ioannis Aslanidis <aslanidis@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: 9a9e2d30-c8fa-43e7-af91-f6e4eb8f4178
X-Archives-Hash: c607af90413fccd9fb3caa52e9fa2f3e
That sounds great!
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 1:02 AM, Sebastian Pipping <sping@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> Quoting Ioannis Aslanidis <aslanidis@gmail.com>:
>>
>> I would prefer to keep the keyword for
>> Bugday Members to administer.
>
> I don't think that sending mails would work well.
> If you want extra control/QA for bugday team members
> I would propose two different keywords: one for bugday
> candidates and one for confirmed bugday bugs.
>
> Any dev could mark bugs as candidates easily and without
> delays while you could still reserve acknoledgement to you.
>
>
>
> Sebastian
>
>
>
>
>
--
Ioannis Aslanidis
http://www.deathwing00.org
<deathwing00[at]gentoo.org> 0x47F370A0