From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-21942-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
id 1HVWIM-0006Ll-Mz
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 17:14:19 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l2PHC3BT031652;
Sun, 25 Mar 2007 17:12:03 GMT
Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.174])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l2PH7Lqi023391
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 17:07:21 GMT
Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id z38so1451829ugc
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 10:07:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=beta;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
b=unnTW/2CCyBFKz3bga493aKy5a/JeR8ISBj6fIsCvq1OI4E7y/OjDN5erDedglepJGD3Yo26U2tbW90ONL5poNWTtyjcaLrzVlnlqFhbdNC1eoQ1nN2B1p8r2nl/XWxX5tCMts1ObsoOCPoAsPoGA7Ho5whzWTHKtDimtz8tPwU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=beta;
h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
b=ZgFqel4G34OtU7KTSq0/9XEUPloV2RHkjhsRajDQd9uWzXWuBSy8ifvddhxVhmk3EF85aPPnTN1TZ7KpvcYuroocBXYyaXpdu6kkEzuiTNmBcf2/fxFN+jhJwy3ZOZJf4a8rzhO7VpoqVrxR24MSTB24rp+w0/4/HCyiTD7H8e0=
Received: by 10.114.166.1 with SMTP id o1mr2231420wae.1174842436835;
Sun, 25 Mar 2007 10:07:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.196.4 with HTTP; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 10:07:16 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <ea440b1d0703251007i28b6cef2u33593442523f3312@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 19:07:16 +0200
From: "Ioannis Aslanidis" <aslanidis@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Proposed addition to the Social Contract
In-Reply-To: <pan.2007.03.25.16.41.27@cox.net>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <1174788467.4883.29.camel@bruichladdich>
<200703251100.00415.vapier@gentoo.org>
<20070325160719.0a4d15c3@snowflake>
<200703251116.13901.vapier@gentoo.org>
<pan.2007.03.25.16.41.27@cox.net>
X-Archives-Salt: 9999ab24-7f78-431f-be42-ef539fc7140a
X-Archives-Hash: 117411bf472e64eee886bac3a5ad013a
I'd like to ask what are the negative side-effects of adding such
paragraph. Are there any true negative side-effects to a specification
like that?
A different topic is the way the paragraph is written. If we don't
like how it is written, we can change it and problem solved.
To be honest, protecting ourselves from things that now seem
improbable, isn't such a bad idea.
On 3/25/07, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> wrote:
> Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> posted
> 200703251116.13901.vapier@gentoo.org, excerpted below, on Sun, 25 Mar
> 2007 11:16:13 -0400:
>
> > well, while we're protecting Gentoo from hypothetical situations that
> > dont exist now but could in the future, we should add a clause that bans
> > collusion with Lucifer as that would of course give us a bad rep
>
> Umm... let's not go where this seems to be heading...
>
> --
> Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
> "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
> and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
>
> --
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>
--
Ioannis Aslanidis
<deathwing00[at]gentoo.org> 0xB9B11F4E
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list