From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <gentoo-dev-return-15507-arch-gentoo-dev=gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org> Received: (qmail 25016 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2004 17:59:31 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 3 Sep 2004 17:59:31 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C3ILS-00084v-G0 for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2004 17:59:30 +0000 Received: (qmail 3984 invoked by uid 89); 3 Sep 2004 17:59:30 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 2294 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2004 17:59:29 +0000 Message-ID: <ea440b1d0409031059364a367b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 19:59:28 +0200 From: Ioannis Aslanidis <aslanidis@gmail.com> Reply-To: deathwing00@forums.gentoo.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <200409031750.32517.luke-jr@utopios.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20040903125147.GB6307@gentoo.org> <20040903155522.3850f2e4@snowdrop.home> <200409031346.43357.vapier@gentoo.org> <200409031750.32517.luke-jr@utopios.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Idea for change of emerge -up output X-Archives-Salt: 19b2b1d9-639f-41f4-a432-7a9c8a9618b5 X-Archives-Hash: 5a2209b109df8352eabb9d59f0b27bfb Will there be an alternative to inject? Sometimes (due to hardware issues) it is necessary to compile manually the sources. So after a make install, a simple emerge inject would do the work... On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 17:50:31 +0000, Luke-Jr <luke-jr@utopios.org> wrote: > On Friday 03 September 2004 5:46 pm, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Friday 03 September 2004 10:55 am, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > > Well, inject should never be used as a matter of course, so I don't > > > think this is a reasonable objection really... > > > > inject is being removed in favor of package.provided (or some file > > similarly named) in /etc/portage/ so yes, i think we can ignore this > > objection -mike > > inject is being removed entirely or just the current implementation? For > compatibility's sake, I'd hope that 'emerge inject' would at least append the > file to give the same effect... > -- > Luke-Jr > Developer, Utopios > http://utopios.org/ > > > > -- > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list > > -- Ioannis Aslanidis <deathwing00[at]forums.gentoo.org> 0xC2539DA3 <aioannis[at]tinet.org> 0xF202D067 <dwcommander[at]users.sourceforge.net> Hellenic Gentoo GNU/Linux project manager (http://hellenicgentoo.sf.net) FIRECOPS++ project manager (http://firecops.sf.net) Computer Engineering student at Universitat Rovira i Virgili -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list