From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-83365-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 534E1138330
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 14:50:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5CCC3E0970;
	Wed, 10 Jan 2018 14:50:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from avasout06.plus.net (avasout06.plus.net [212.159.14.18])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7071E094E
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 14:50:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.6.147] ([212.159.46.162])
	by smtp with ESMTP
	id ZHhseDZHVe5nXZHhuen3oP; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 14:50:22 +0000
X-CM-Score: 0.00
X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=TsHIegfh c=1 sm=1 tr=0
 a=RuViaDnnNG9rfPLW4VJocg==:117 a=RuViaDnnNG9rfPLW4VJocg==:17
 a=13zjGPudsaEWiJwPRgMA:9 a=EM1FLKRHAAAA:8 a=vGY7XakPAAAA:8
 a=-QMPON29m7RKWy2JW0QA:9 a=7Zwj6sZBwVKJAoWSPKxL6X1jA+E=:19 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10
 a=gxsNB4-PEk_8QNtDgTwA:9 a=ONNS8QRKHyMA:10
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Upcoming posting restrictions on the gentoo-dev
 mailing list
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
References: <1685019.DAF74n7IXa@pinacolada>
 <20180110054855.GA4483@angelfall.a21an.org>
 <20180110085511.71b42c93@abudhabi.paradoxon.rec>
 <1515581849.31546.22.camel@gentoo.org>
 <55c6983b-511c-aeb6-c7ef-6f5848ccc797@gmail.com>
From: "M. J. Everitt" <m.j.everitt@iee.org>
Openpgp: id=BA266E0525CFAB101523351B4C30334F93C22371
Message-ID: <e95c3710-e0b2-91c3-7da9-c61a8d3cc65e@iee.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 14:50:20 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.3.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <55c6983b-511c-aeb6-c7ef-6f5848ccc797@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="Oqes4A8E43UHOFKWWisA4VvsqWPgwNOq6"
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfOieQJjALIXuWHRc/LX65ltxYE0ncs4ECjAn4xQqM5somsSCHqqjN+g0ia36jIQYVkgxvQkD3luI7/vJFOYw09gC9cXSa3QXGju7b036eUYCAxFLs5/W
 xYtUMaI50r+buAJm3P0e1k0vsHNR24LfW0HJAENIpeJjw/j+QDxkDiMBMvnwFk4vGEkYkOecBIoKPg==
X-Archives-Salt: e6d2d0ef-d216-44ac-be2f-e8a311b0bab1
X-Archives-Hash: 3e672becb7663c7449a25478af2c3bc2

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--Oqes4A8E43UHOFKWWisA4VvsqWPgwNOq6
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="wvCr8rfntgfO4gTOupBWtHOC3loO35DlE";
 protected-headers="v1"
From: "M. J. Everitt" <m.j.everitt@iee.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Message-ID: <e95c3710-e0b2-91c3-7da9-c61a8d3cc65e@iee.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Upcoming posting restrictions on the gentoo-dev
 mailing list
References: <1685019.DAF74n7IXa@pinacolada>
 <20180110054855.GA4483@angelfall.a21an.org>
 <20180110085511.71b42c93@abudhabi.paradoxon.rec>
 <1515581849.31546.22.camel@gentoo.org>
 <55c6983b-511c-aeb6-c7ef-6f5848ccc797@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <55c6983b-511c-aeb6-c7ef-6f5848ccc797@gmail.com>

--wvCr8rfntgfO4gTOupBWtHOC3loO35DlE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 10/01/18 13:49, kuzetsa wrote:
> On 01/10/2018 05:57 AM, David Seifert wrote:
>> On Wed, 2018-01-10 at 08:55 +0100, Lars Wendler wrote:
>>> On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 08:48:56 +0300 Eray Aslan wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 10:20:56PM +0100, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>>>>> * Posting to the list will only be possible to Gentoo developers
>>>>> and
>>>>>   whitelisted additional participants. =20
>>>> This is so contrary to what I and I thought Gentoo stands for:
>>>> openness, transparency, inclusiveness even when these require a
>>>> rather
>>>> thick skin and result in high noise.  It's a price worth paying.
>>>>
>>>> I guess I should a) pay more attention to council elections b)
>>>> consider
>>>> the idea that the whole council thing as it stands now is just not
>>>> working.
>>>>
>>> Wow. I couldn't have said it better.=20
>>> Seems we're turning into an elitist club or something...=20
>>> I wonder how many users we're going to loose on this one. Well done
>>> council :-(
>>>
>> If your only reason to use Gentoo is because you can post to the main
>> developer ML, and not because we try to provide a great distribution
>> with lots of choice, a current toolchain and lots of customization,
>> then you're likely using the wrong distribution.
>>
> If development of a quality distribution which meets
> these goals requires thick skin, something is broken:
>
> I've never seen anything from the gentoo foundation
> which suggests that the gentoo developer mail list
> should be considered a safe space for disparaging
> remarks. Think of the messaging on this - for every
> 1 or 2 people who are willing to come forward to
> address these concerns, there are likely "not zero"
> who didn't want to deal with confrontation and the
> risk that rudeness and hostile behavior would be
> defended.
>
Your argument seems partially contradictory here, and I think the
interpretation may be muddled with language barriers for those
developers/users with English as a foreign language ...

Are you reinforcing the point [widely accepted by many whose heads
aren't in the proverbial sand[0]] that Gentoo is [or is becoming] an
elitist club, or condoning "bad behaviour" by both devs and non-devs on
the mailing lists....

Your final point, however, makes a lot of sense .. [1]


[0] - https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/head-in-the-sand
[1] - https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/keep+head+down


--wvCr8rfntgfO4gTOupBWtHOC3loO35DlE--

--Oqes4A8E43UHOFKWWisA4VvsqWPgwNOq6
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJaVigsAAoJEGPnxnn01DHd4l0P/0EDiRlZ8Ga8gtocZFrr5X0B
DcqmzfZrYKvB2dRtB9+BgjLKgu2gGMdQ3iP+6sBVJSWZAzJM3Cam5QCYBXqZ9O6n
gKcrnhXPog7eov4pHtQfhSPprbB9c98Ss2XO/X7I77JhUv/53ZLBcT6XdehzeLZN
L8+q0UU8cUBA/CGiz/NAGpSeJm8PWk2iR/ZzYlzoKXmSGElAQoNLiMif04izfMXs
HA0FR/RqbpPEc+WsMpgCEMSXQ0CGVqKCxPh5VNa90p2xCrn839N1ctWHVJ6+njHY
VF5ZvFlIGC+1I+BHaY/H/mkDo+Ia+AtZKiDAis9NdhuxFGI7bbJwJLSa51XY7sz2
LKWewgxo3e+NOvqlHzO/lGNq1n8ZP5S5+K4ULZYvSgpRdhiSBpbIwjCv3i6Zmh2e
uRJfQ2oc65k/1E5NmgQWQgl/00jy+IKW60eiweu3iqZ+pablPVWB5ZZJ8R2QDpay
Md9FdPcMyCSYif8Iu5f3214os9VluwcieNNwNBWVUlb/kdg+o0+igxdI2Jmx/q/A
QVzjUZcV2r/bt67lqoiOtAWLmQzMKC9r7suShMDO0x2bzFqWrQdoXutl9rDLOom2
Egx2czxVw9P6ZM2wxNb6RrvclWDKMqjmOg4btE2p0TYb5AyDNSWlnRuH9Sdi9POh
+5CFYSgcDUfqfl1jUr9N
=7ZFf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Oqes4A8E43UHOFKWWisA4VvsqWPgwNOq6--