From: "M. J. Everitt" <m.j.everitt@iee.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Upcoming posting restrictions on the gentoo-dev mailing list
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 14:50:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e95c3710-e0b2-91c3-7da9-c61a8d3cc65e@iee.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55c6983b-511c-aeb6-c7ef-6f5848ccc797@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2470 bytes --]
On 10/01/18 13:49, kuzetsa wrote:
> On 01/10/2018 05:57 AM, David Seifert wrote:
>> On Wed, 2018-01-10 at 08:55 +0100, Lars Wendler wrote:
>>> On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 08:48:56 +0300 Eray Aslan wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 10:20:56PM +0100, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>>>>> * Posting to the list will only be possible to Gentoo developers
>>>>> and
>>>>> whitelisted additional participants.
>>>> This is so contrary to what I and I thought Gentoo stands for:
>>>> openness, transparency, inclusiveness even when these require a
>>>> rather
>>>> thick skin and result in high noise. It's a price worth paying.
>>>>
>>>> I guess I should a) pay more attention to council elections b)
>>>> consider
>>>> the idea that the whole council thing as it stands now is just not
>>>> working.
>>>>
>>> Wow. I couldn't have said it better.
>>> Seems we're turning into an elitist club or something...
>>> I wonder how many users we're going to loose on this one. Well done
>>> council :-(
>>>
>> If your only reason to use Gentoo is because you can post to the main
>> developer ML, and not because we try to provide a great distribution
>> with lots of choice, a current toolchain and lots of customization,
>> then you're likely using the wrong distribution.
>>
> If development of a quality distribution which meets
> these goals requires thick skin, something is broken:
>
> I've never seen anything from the gentoo foundation
> which suggests that the gentoo developer mail list
> should be considered a safe space for disparaging
> remarks. Think of the messaging on this - for every
> 1 or 2 people who are willing to come forward to
> address these concerns, there are likely "not zero"
> who didn't want to deal with confrontation and the
> risk that rudeness and hostile behavior would be
> defended.
>
Your argument seems partially contradictory here, and I think the
interpretation may be muddled with language barriers for those
developers/users with English as a foreign language ...
Are you reinforcing the point [widely accepted by many whose heads
aren't in the proverbial sand[0]] that Gentoo is [or is becoming] an
elitist club, or condoning "bad behaviour" by both devs and non-devs on
the mailing lists....
Your final point, however, makes a lot of sense .. [1]
[0] - https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/head-in-the-sand
[1] - https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/keep+head+down
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-10 14:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-09 21:20 [gentoo-dev] Upcoming posting restrictions on the gentoo-dev mailing list Andreas K. Huettel
2018-01-09 22:20 ` Francesco Riosa
2018-01-09 22:27 ` Alec Warner
2018-01-10 0:37 ` Philip Webb
2018-01-10 1:24 ` Michael Orlitzky
2018-01-10 1:08 ` Matt Turner
2018-01-10 9:55 ` Michał Górny
2018-01-10 17:11 ` Matt Turner
2018-01-10 19:06 ` Michał Górny
2018-01-10 19:31 ` Alec Warner
2018-01-10 19:45 ` Michał Górny
2018-01-10 20:48 ` M. J. Everitt
2018-01-10 21:13 ` Alec Warner
2018-01-10 5:48 ` Eray Aslan
2018-01-10 7:55 ` Lars Wendler
2018-01-10 10:57 ` David Seifert
2018-01-10 13:49 ` kuzetsa
2018-01-10 14:50 ` M. J. Everitt [this message]
2018-01-15 13:26 ` Tom H
2018-01-15 15:09 ` Rich Freeman
2018-01-15 22:49 ` Gordon Pettey
2018-01-10 14:55 ` Alexander Berntsen
2018-01-10 15:09 ` M. J. Everitt
2018-01-10 15:52 ` kuzetsa
2018-01-11 7:03 ` Eray Aslan
2018-01-11 8:30 ` Lars Wendler
2018-01-10 9:53 ` Michał Górny
2018-01-10 11:14 ` Andreas K. Huettel
2018-01-10 17:16 ` Vincent-Xavier JUMEL
2018-01-10 19:44 ` Michał Górny
2018-01-11 1:12 ` Andreas K. Huettel
2018-01-11 4:22 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2018-01-11 5:37 ` Gordon Pettey
2018-01-11 8:21 ` Lars Wendler
2018-01-11 17:07 ` [gentoo-dev] " Peter Stuge
2018-01-11 17:34 ` Rich Freeman
2018-01-11 17:59 ` Matthias Maier
2018-01-13 0:02 ` Paul B. Henson
2018-01-11 14:48 ` R0b0t1
2018-01-11 17:03 ` Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
2018-01-10 19:56 ` Fabian Groffen
2018-01-10 22:28 ` Roy Bamford
2018-01-10 23:20 ` Rich Freeman
2018-01-10 23:27 ` M. J. Everitt
2018-01-10 23:35 ` Rich Freeman
2018-01-10 23:39 ` M. J. Everitt
2018-01-11 1:03 ` Andreas K. Huettel
2018-01-11 11:44 ` Roy Bamford
2018-01-11 3:22 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] " Benda Xu
2018-01-11 19:54 ` William Hubbs
2018-01-12 23:58 ` [gentoo-dev] " Paul B. Henson
2018-03-20 8:52 ` Kristian Fiskerstrand
2018-03-24 3:11 ` Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike)
2018-03-24 3:34 ` Aaron Bauman
2018-03-25 4:07 ` Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e95c3710-e0b2-91c3-7da9-c61a8d3cc65e@iee.org \
--to=m.j.everitt@iee.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox