From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85C2C158041 for ; Sat, 30 Mar 2024 15:02:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6E9BA2BC051; Sat, 30 Mar 2024 15:02:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFC5F2BC01D for ; Sat, 30 Mar 2024 15:02:30 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Current unavoidable use of xz utils in Gentoo From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2024 16:02:25 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <20240329204315.3b29449b@Akita> <1671d927-55d5-6f01-2b54-b33981406945@gmail.com> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-ECW2K/MlKd61cAlBg3R8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.50.4 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: cfe8a4b7-92c5-433d-af63-835a0bd425d3 X-Archives-Hash: 908e578cf679b1196212d75e39b4fbd8 --=-ECW2K/MlKd61cAlBg3R8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2024-03-30 at 14:57 +0000, Eddie Chapman wrote: > Note, I'm not advocating ripping xz-utils out of tree, all I'm saying is > wouldn't it be nice if there were at least 2 alternatives to choose from? > That doesn't have to be disruptive in any way, people who wish to continu= e > using and trusting xz-utils should be able to continue to do so without > any friction whatsoever. So, you're basically saying we should go out of our way, recompress all distfiles using two alternative compression formats, increase mirror load four times and add a lot of complexity to ebuilds, right? --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --=-ECW2K/MlKd61cAlBg3R8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFGBAABCgAwFiEEx2qEUJQJjSjMiybFY5ra4jKeJA4FAmYIKYESHG1nb3JueUBn ZW50b28ub3JnAAoJEGOa2uIyniQOKTIH/icsMrYvTP7q+lEt5wehBlSfTAVUDI4/ GeRcin7z2eGQT5JxmJsgxMpBZAS4AbOgWOzzo9FEkMWbUVovreH9JsGX00HCZk2j M3NQvZC6LUJDrnWDntMRNMfpSpjr92BsGaKAawAbpnwrjuZv4VMxh/jGjcxPIw4m 7MqJtFZOU/7j3IZ0FYM0zU17obr88Mk2gf77S2f+J9SSlNpjCZRP/L0EEozp0IA8 b1jHogPFY2kOCXNufjtpTwfSbQcApEunG1snYkLc0Yczdj7pMnd1Zxr6JzNcgiz6 iXiC5pIClUGLBJznQ5X36LnvLWBOK6WEdtSfIbxGUAm7bXyy5TdRkfE= =1fUq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-ECW2K/MlKd61cAlBg3R8--