On Sat, 2024-03-30 at 14:57 +0000, Eddie Chapman wrote:
> Note, I'm not advocating ripping xz-utils out of tree, all I'm saying is
> wouldn't it be nice if there were at least 2 alternatives to choose from?
> That doesn't have to be disruptive in any way, people who wish to continue
> using and trusting xz-utils should be able to continue to do so without
> any friction whatsoever.

So, you're basically saying we should go out of our way, recompress all
distfiles using two alternative compression formats, increase mirror
load four times and add a lot of complexity to ebuilds, right?

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny