From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14B5F1382C5 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 08:46:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9F120E08FB; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 08:46:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (mail.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6433BE08C0 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 08:46:51 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Value of Continuous integration vs Code Review / Pull Requests From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2020 10:46:44 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-O4CYAWEL3O4Nr1N6CXD4" User-Agent: Evolution 3.36.2 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: f002d47e-2f96-49a2-a921-1b0e080c4cfd X-Archives-Hash: f07e5534a4647c521239066206477c3f --=-O4CYAWEL3O4Nr1N6CXD4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2020-06-02 at 10:44 +0200, Mathy Vanvoorden wrote: > Hi, >=20 > Sorry I'm a bit late to the party here but was behind on my emails. >=20 > Op wo 27 mei 2020 om 05:25 schreef Alec Warner : >=20 > > The TL;DR is that a crack team of infra-folks[0] have been putting > > together demos of CI services and things like gitlab / gitea / gerrit a= nd > > so on. > >=20 > >=20 > I didn't see in the email chain any mention of the Atlassian tools. Can > these be considered? They offer free licenses for open source projects an= d > I think that most of the requirements are covered by BitBucket > (repo-hosting, repo-serving, code review and pull requests) and Bamboo (C= I). >=20 > If desired I can setup a demo and/or help maintain the tools, this is my > day job and for those who care about these kind of things I am Atlassian > certified. >=20 > Here is more info on their licensing for Open Source projects: >=20 > https://www.atlassian.com/software/views/open-source-license-request >=20 1. This is not free software. 2. Atlassian has done a few very bad moves lately, and they're unlikely to survive on the market for very long. 3. The whole point of having something self-hosted is not to rely on third party hosting it for us. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --=-O4CYAWEL3O4Nr1N6CXD4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGTBAABCgB9FiEEx2qEUJQJjSjMiybFY5ra4jKeJA4FAl7WEfRfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEM3 NkE4NDUwOTQwOThEMjhDQzhCMjZDNTYzOUFEQUUyMzI5RTI0MEUACgkQY5ra4jKe JA6wwAf/Rd63Q/Tz1mSiVusLpTyN+09iv3pHn9ZLah6nO0o5OWncIkWCTLY5vGJG +0GT/oFR9PR3T94V6qu8kEG4ugAcJZCg4OU/h/LwpL/uWbBLfOW9lR50M9KBxstn /h4Nzr6TbtcdH2a92T//qLMu5pm1w4JaAeNz7ocVcuPb5hHn9nDOX3wf0Saassby EOOMDF2uf9zzo/Oe+AVox9USdQijTgqcVo1WF2MlAkRXhtwm1z/hH5Swp9cSlfsh gvOSad/VqdBIOpu29l2pEIjkqKnJWAGvnm5eeaHcnJzHviQYapW62qbEnX9633mS HSGDei6ATVE9mIprex21XlJcziqm8Q== =Dxp2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-O4CYAWEL3O4Nr1N6CXD4--