From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FxXdm-0002Wi-S2 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2006 23:15:43 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k63NEGxi020154; Mon, 3 Jul 2006 23:14:16 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k63N9xjt012977 for ; Mon, 3 Jul 2006 23:09:59 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF2856413C for ; Mon, 3 Jul 2006 23:09:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26238-02 for ; Mon, 3 Jul 2006 23:09:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BF236400A for ; Mon, 3 Jul 2006 23:09:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1FxXXw-0007FD-53 for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Tue, 04 Jul 2006 01:09:40 +0200 Received: from ppp-62-245-211-20.dynamic.mnet-online.de ([62.245.211.20]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 04 Jul 2006 01:09:40 +0200 Received: from genstef by ppp-62-245-211-20.dynamic.mnet-online.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 04 Jul 2006 01:09:40 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Stefan Schweizer Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for July Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2006 01:08:53 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20060701112900.76A1A647BA@smtp.gentoo.org> <200607031504.56022.vapier@gentoo.org> <20060703194136.GB4154@osgiliath> <200607031551.38376.vapier@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp-62-245-211-20.dynamic.mnet-online.de User-Agent: KNode/0.10.2 Sender: news X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.522 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.077, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.522 X-Spam-Level: X-Archives-Salt: 948734fe-0725-47e4-87e7-82ae0d5f14e2 X-Archives-Hash: d97ed0d441ea22a387a10032b5dab558 Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Monday 03 July 2006 15:41, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 03:04:55PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> > the entire point of these threads is to address developer concerns >> > to that sunrise can be folded back into Gentoo >> >> Really? According to who? > > presumably the Sunrise guys considering they started the thread > Yeah, this is right. Sunrise is meant to be Gentoo. >> We only just had the userrel + sunrise meeting where the people behind >> Project Sunrise said they would continue the project as an unofficial >> project. > > Stefan would have to comment on this then > Yeah, we got frequent problems with offical/unofficial/suspended or not so much suspended. Consequently to sort out this issue we came to the conclusion to make it fully unofficial in the meeting. It works this way but it is not how I wish Sunrise to operate. It needs to have approval and that is why we discuss Sunrise and improve it constantly. >> Even if they have changed their minds about this, I think it is too >> early to re-evaluate the project for inclusion. > > maybe, but ignoring constant requests for feedback isnt helping anyone > -mike Agreed, and waiting does not help Sunrise either. Best regards, Stefan -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list