[gentoo-dev] rfc Bugzilla summary for packages in overlays [overlay] vs. ::overlay

[gentoo-dev] rfc Bugzilla summary for packages in overlays [overlay] vs. ::overlay

[Jonas Stein]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 808 bytes --]

Dear all,

at the moment we suggest use the "standard format of the Summary" [1]
[name_overlay] CATEGORY/PKG(-version(-revision)) - {problem
description}/{action}

However this is contrary to the format in our logfiles, which use

CATEGORY/PKG(-version(-revision))::name_overlay - {problem
description}/{action}

Should we adjust the Bugzilla summary format to our logfiles?

Reason:
A unified format is useful to assign and work on bugs efficiently.
We could also enhance the bug assignment helper [2]
But [] brackets are often used for USE flags in bug tickets, the ::
format would be easier to parse.

Did I miss a point?
Do you think this makes sense?

[1] https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Bug-wranglers
[2] https://github.com/mgorny/bug-assign-user-js

-- 
Best,
Jonas


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 981 bytes --]