From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FgOjP-0005l9-6W for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 17 May 2006 16:18:39 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k4HGEq15016598; Wed, 17 May 2006 16:14:52 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4HG0Wib029208 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 16:00:32 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3706642F5 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 16:00:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10213-02 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 16:00:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97FCB642C6 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 16:00:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1FgORP-0002Us-GL for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Wed, 17 May 2006 18:00:03 +0200 Received: from ip68-230-97-182.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.230.97.182]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 18:00:03 +0200 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-230-97-182.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 18:00:03 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: "Duncan" <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Paludis and Profiles Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 15:57:39 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Organization? Me? Message-ID: References: <20060516161549.442b4d8a@localhost> <446A1B5D.8040402@gentoo.org> <200605162105.52805.kugelfang@gentoo.org> <20060516231453.171002b9@epia.jeroenr-c2.orkz.net> <20060516232253.2c589768@localhost> <1147874321.16876.13.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <446B306C.5040901@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-230-97-182.ph.ph.cox.net User-Agent: pan 0.97 (Atoz and Tanda) Sender: news X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.594 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.005, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.594 X-Spam-Level: X-Archives-Salt: 2f249f57-f7be-4ade-a9d7-f2168dc467fb X-Archives-Hash: 381808c628ad5dc928531f73f9081f00 Patrick McLean posted 446B306C.5040901@gentoo.org, excerpted below, on Wed, 17 May 2006 10:17:16 -0400: > Deprecated profiles are considered unsupported, as are most of the > gentoo-alt profiles. Also most arches have development profiles which > are considered unsupported (on amd64 we add a profile.bashrc that dies > unless something like I_WANT_TO_BREAK_MY_SYSTEM=1 is set). ... And the proposal included a deprecated file. By that definition, therefore, the profile would be unsupported, and the point you were making disappears. -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list