From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FgOd7-0004tH-2q for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 17 May 2006 16:12:09 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k4HG6T0a017083; Wed, 17 May 2006 16:06:29 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4HFuZW0024109 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 15:56:35 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 384616435A for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 15:56:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17873-03-3 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 15:56:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 851EA642F9 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 15:56:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1FgONd-0001bK-Rn for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Wed, 17 May 2006 17:56:10 +0200 Received: from ip68-230-97-182.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.230.97.182]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 17:56:09 +0200 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-230-97-182.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 17:56:09 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: "Duncan" <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Paludis and Profiles Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 15:55:40 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Organization? Me? Message-ID: References: <20060516161549.442b4d8a@localhost> <200605171204.33647.pauldv@gentoo.org> <20060517145705.70b1f15a@snowdrop.home> <200605171711.10418.pauldv@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-230-97-182.ph.ph.cox.net User-Agent: pan 0.97 (Atoz and Tanda) Sender: news X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.594 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.005, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.594 X-Spam-Level: X-Archives-Salt: ada8fcb5-27ad-461c-bb20-0170ba048bf6 X-Archives-Hash: 2439306d350069650ba1fa29b4ece334 Paul de Vrieze posted 200605171711.10418.pauldv@gentoo.org, excerpted below, on Wed, 17 May 2006 17:11:04 +0200: > Let's make clear why I put this in. Basically I am of the opinion that > until a decision is made to make (in this case) paludis the primary > package manager, all official packages should work with portage. Package > masked packages are not considered official. Wasn't it stated that the mechanism paludis uses to hide ebuilds that won't work in portage from portage is to mask them to it? IOW, this is already the way it is being handled. If masked packages aren't official, and ebuilds that require features only in paludis are masked as far as portage is concerned, then that checkbox can be checked off. -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list