From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC7E8138334 for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 01:02:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B53ACE0930; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 01:02:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (mail.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74090E08DC for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 01:02:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (c-98-218-46-55.hsd1.md.comcast.net [98.218.46.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mjo) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CF89934B38E for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 01:02:34 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/1] go-module.eclass: introduce new eclass to handle go modules To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20190918202631.8667-1-williamh@gentoo.org> <20190918202631.8667-2-williamh@gentoo.org> <20190918212814.GB8809@whubbs1.dev.av1.gaikai.org> From: Michael Orlitzky Message-ID: Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 21:02:32 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190918212814.GB8809@whubbs1.dev.av1.gaikai.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 406eb5bf-c9d4-454f-b68c-4c6917926c3e X-Archives-Hash: 1439d5a68f9087843104590c6cf60c65 On 9/18/19 5:28 PM, William Hubbs wrote: >> >> I don't really understand why you're adding it to *this* eclass. Isn't >> it true for all Go packages? So I suppose golang-* eclasses are >> affected as well. > > You are correct, they are affected. No one, including myself, caught > that during the review cycle for those eclasses. I've been bitching about this for at least four years: https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/2e89a3ccf9ceb4b61418d0ce30939f92