From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F44B158008 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2023 15:48:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 603C2E08E5; Thu, 15 Jun 2023 15:47:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (dev.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0ABC4E08DA for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2023 15:47:58 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 11:47:55 -0400 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/102.0 Thunderbird/102.11.0 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] What happened to gcc-12.3.0? Content-Language: en-US To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: From: Joshua Kinard In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 7ffd890e-4913-4271-bb79-86b14fa11bcf X-Archives-Hash: 25c64841831568463e7c729e3847f6a5 On 6/15/2023 01:04, Matt Turner wrote: > On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 12:02 AM Joshua Kinard wrote: > Options? I mean, if anyone knows magic to make gcc build faster, I > am all ears, but ever since the switch to >> C++, the time needed for it to build itself has just been absolutely horrendous. And it gets worse with each >> new release, for some reason. > > EXTRA_ECONF=--disable-bootstrap > > See https://bugs.gentoo.org/705406#c1 Thanks, I'll give this a go and see what the build time differences are like. I always thought the extra build phase was unnecessary for typical builds, but I never recalled gcc having this switch before. I don't exactly play around in its internals much these days, so I probably missed its addition. Any thought been given to making it into a feature controlled by a USE flag? E.g., 'full-bootstrap' or something, defaulting to on, to build all three stages, and users can turn it off to skip the comparison stage? -- Joshua Kinard Gentoo/MIPS kumba@gentoo.org rsa6144/5C63F4E3F5C6C943 2015-04-27 177C 1972 1FB8 F254 BAD0 3E72 5C63 F4E3 F5C6 C943 "The past tempts us, the present confuses us, the future frightens us. And our lives slip away, moment by moment, lost in that vast, terrible in-between." --Emperor Turhan, Centauri Republic