From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-39989-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>) id 1Npqk4-0007mc-CX for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:20:33 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 57A7BE0586; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:20:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-fx0-f213.google.com (mail-fx0-f213.google.com [209.85.220.213]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4384E0E83 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:20:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm5 with SMTP id 5so671517fxm.29 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:20:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=5iRI4hcOEkYGEs0WSRB4sLRPjvUmkIw5GrVVlOzN0uI=; b=YVTnoSmch8Cr4sHzjJgXrcU2rztozz1vqXy84e9O6kf28mEM4/DG9q+DIRkUw7f8AF vFKDAjnWbuVPGCPL/XTOkjIWvrHP1sDsvHUDS97DrPlrsKMriozk7ELRUzFspCZzgiRH +8ZTGy1+qZZs/NJ5baeywydbYxD8zWsmtNauA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=gjob0Tr0dbdVktDE/tRbpC9XmGZmAvYL4qkeYHdlEhm3eZiQE22+ctjE0+WUZrujsT vfSSEskIw1Xxj0UnoxwagMmoAJ6VPeeXK0tjkCqtalL4EHf9BrfGkv3E9viW0uE9P+g5 yG+l7wiEmvEicUHxn0OMg5+wRjVN7CM8us4KY= Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: yngwin.gentoo@gmail.com Received: by 10.239.193.135 with SMTP id j7mr443549hbi.58.1268346008120; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:20:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1268338853.29433.0.camel@localhost> References: <201003041652.56521.tampakrap@gentoo.org> <201003080318.02585.tampakrap@gentoo.org> <e117dbb91003101736j664db7c7pdd46144bbe830b49@mail.gmail.com> <1268338853.29433.0.camel@localhost> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 23:20:08 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: e539b625f1c0bc64 Message-ID: <e117dbb91003111420w656ec61ax677b65737ea02027@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Split desktop profile patches & news item for review From: Ben de Groot <yngwin@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: f626d604-05d9-48fa-aa3b-0d4f15e7f8f6 X-Archives-Hash: e2ddb1651f72d3b9f5688d945e7c83e4 On 11 March 2010 21:20, Mart Raudsepp <leio@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 02:36 +0100, Ben de Groot wrote: >> Seeing as there were no further comments, I think we are good to go! > > I suggest reading my comments... Unless I missed something, you didn't make any comments on this thread. If you mean the thread you started that tangentially took off from this one, about eselect profile improvements: I support that proposal, but it will take some time to get implemented. Is anyone already working on that? In the meantime I see no reason for that to halt or postpone the current desktop profile improvements as prepared by Theo. Cheers, -- Ben de Groot Gentoo Linux developer (qt, media, lxde, desktop-misc) ______________________________________________________