From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-39989-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1Npqk4-0007mc-CX
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:20:33 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 57A7BE0586;
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:20:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-fx0-f213.google.com (mail-fx0-f213.google.com [209.85.220.213])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4384E0E83
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:20:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by fxm5 with SMTP id 5so671517fxm.29
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:20:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to
:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type;
bh=5iRI4hcOEkYGEs0WSRB4sLRPjvUmkIw5GrVVlOzN0uI=;
b=YVTnoSmch8Cr4sHzjJgXrcU2rztozz1vqXy84e9O6kf28mEM4/DG9q+DIRkUw7f8AF
vFKDAjnWbuVPGCPL/XTOkjIWvrHP1sDsvHUDS97DrPlrsKMriozk7ELRUzFspCZzgiRH
+8ZTGy1+qZZs/NJ5baeywydbYxD8zWsmtNauA=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
b=gjob0Tr0dbdVktDE/tRbpC9XmGZmAvYL4qkeYHdlEhm3eZiQE22+ctjE0+WUZrujsT
vfSSEskIw1Xxj0UnoxwagMmoAJ6VPeeXK0tjkCqtalL4EHf9BrfGkv3E9viW0uE9P+g5
yG+l7wiEmvEicUHxn0OMg5+wRjVN7CM8us4KY=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: yngwin.gentoo@gmail.com
Received: by 10.239.193.135 with SMTP id j7mr443549hbi.58.1268346008120; Thu,
11 Mar 2010 14:20:08 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1268338853.29433.0.camel@localhost>
References: <201003041652.56521.tampakrap@gentoo.org>
<201003080318.02585.tampakrap@gentoo.org>
<e117dbb91003101736j664db7c7pdd46144bbe830b49@mail.gmail.com>
<1268338853.29433.0.camel@localhost>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 23:20:08 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: e539b625f1c0bc64
Message-ID: <e117dbb91003111420w656ec61ax677b65737ea02027@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Split desktop profile patches & news item for
review
From: Ben de Groot <yngwin@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: f626d604-05d9-48fa-aa3b-0d4f15e7f8f6
X-Archives-Hash: e2ddb1651f72d3b9f5688d945e7c83e4
On 11 March 2010 21:20, Mart Raudsepp <leio@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 02:36 +0100, Ben de Groot wrote:
>> Seeing as there were no further comments, I think we are good to go!
>
> I suggest reading my comments...
Unless I missed something, you didn't make any comments on this
thread.
If you mean the thread you started that tangentially took off from this
one, about eselect profile improvements: I support that proposal,
but it will take some time to get implemented. Is anyone already
working on that?
In the meantime I see no reason for that to halt or postpone the
current desktop profile improvements as prepared by Theo.
Cheers,
--
Ben de Groot
Gentoo Linux developer (qt, media, lxde, desktop-misc)
______________________________________________________