From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NpX95-0003OM-82 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 01:25:03 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E2F8EE098E; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 01:24:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-fx0-f215.google.com (mail-fx0-f215.google.com [209.85.220.215]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C50FE0936 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 01:24:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so1329896fxm.26 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:24:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/boDHhYX+X6nvD5lxJ5G+yBgaMwW+BAzycO7zzX+l/Q=; b=BcZBG9gMgEvCqL/HjSB5X1FhLH0iCyr3jA2CNSkeX1RLprHis8tnjlSN6Dzc4ZIKhI Ucrxhlmm6caSfBth2OlcnwCO//IoY9AGOPWGkDyJTHxEAst73rbCBWkyG+1DWIR/y1z1 46RCB7RP45+QVeUOQeTKKAp/qS7wDXeMmxqrU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=NYV2/sRM8bBbBFTRP/xNnUkplNqGj4XefKjkujSjrSNzJSm7H86iHmt7jVOhBCsbAX wh8a3N++Iec4LssupNWuuXzC1H8SbZOT6B3DPxOC2lNT6bTJ0DBz16AusdqHBaQwpYv0 nR+bhZ1g45Q7nvaqnG3UlS2OLYL7ZluoRB26U= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: yngwin.gentoo@gmail.com Received: by 10.239.161.76 with SMTP id g12mr238388hbd.182.1268270686622; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:24:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20100311002514.GA19387@linux1> References: <201003041923.17749.Arfrever@gentoo.org> <4B919F98.2090208@gentoo.org> <20100308212816.GA1309@linux1> <201003101837.02887.Arfrever@gentoo.org> <20100311002514.GA19387@linux1> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 02:24:46 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 18f8f583ce752a0b Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item From: Ben de Groot To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 9b55b666-4d81-427d-9544-c32988088eaa X-Archives-Hash: a1dbddab4cd397eb86b3b5cf7e8c1ebb On 11 March 2010 01:25, William Hubbs wrote: > =C2=A0If someone has a package that truly works with either python 2 or 3= , > =C2=A0what is the harm in automatically pulling in python 3 and installin= g > =C2=A0the package for both python 2 and 3? > > =C2=A0As long as pulling in python-3 doesn't change the system's default > =C2=A0python interpretor I don't see a problem with having them both > =C2=A0installed. I've seen enough python-3 specific bugs to know it is not without problems. It's a waste of time and resources for something that is not ready to be used anyway. While it can be argued that that is what our testing branch is for, it is certainly not something that should be pushed to stable users. Even if it would be just "dead weight", it is not something we should wish for. It is bloat, it is unnecessary, and causes more problems than that it solves. Why should users have to compile multiple python versions, if they only use one anyway? Cheers, --=20 Ben de Groot Gentoo Linux developer (qt, media, lxde, desktop-misc) ______________________________________________________