From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NpMSi-0008Ih-LC for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:00:36 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5998EE0827; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:00:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.155]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB4F2E0BF6 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:59:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 19so1409119fgg.10 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 05:59:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=Ifn+F85FU3C5pSR4SM4jNS9AONdgSzsHR/l3IirqX7w=; b=gjP7KjcwHr7opsjAQr73rd/q69lYFo8KLNEdpKUqbl/vtHBPASHC3GS3Crd0RvDtGJ 31yvmuS1H3Fpxdrhza4jR2uNnMaRcnG5LqoQaNluLTrlTaEUbQCv46BakEMaf2LKDurl JsqaksiPrh4zTyn7ZhbpPtfEj1hOVwBxdtU8w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=wVGxAoBfGYRNHbPQcVwB/6jXsVbxWSy3c79aQPzIQ3xOz/P1KRB17c2g6dKsE0B0j9 HXQdb+PAUDfXbO+qYQzRTkGAWyqQ3PxZgQzwCMO1GUml9fGtqjpDK9F6Zp4UH5gshRhM 5kHkX6898TyejAj7pEMmXtU2WiRuQ8xtYxTe8= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: yngwin.gentoo@gmail.com Received: by 10.239.180.19 with SMTP id f19mr158711hbg.35.1268229598133; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 05:59:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B972B6D.2020602@gentoo.org> References: <4B971B38.3070907@gentoo.org> <4B9720D6.6010702@gentoo.org> <20100309210004.51b15a4e@angelstorm> <4B972B6D.2020602@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:59:58 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: dbfa1cf2d0fd4f77 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] How about a monthly bumpday? From: Ben de Groot To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: 6a1d6a7b-a5f0-44a1-ac35-0176a7cfddf6 X-Archives-Hash: d29a474295df5222fef15d85e80d2116 On 10 March 2010 06:17, Sebastian Pipping wrote: > On 03/10/10 06:00, Joshua Saddler wrote: >> Bumpdays are otherwise a good idea, though I'm not sure why we need a separate day for that in addition to our standard bugdays. > [...] > Also, another day means one more day a month with people working on > Gentoo theoretically. I think it would be better to have it all happen on the same day. If those are easy bumps, they fit very well with bugday. And those devs who want to work on that, can then join the general bugday mayhem. ;-) You might be spreading things too thinly otherwise. And even for the more involved bumps it could be handy to have users around for testing. Cheers, -- Ben de Groot Gentoo Linux developer (qt, media, lxde, desktop-misc) ______________________________________________________