From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-39765-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1NnJeL-0008HA-5S
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 22:36:09 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2636AE0BEF;
Thu, 4 Mar 2010 22:36:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-fx0-f222.google.com (mail-fx0-f222.google.com [209.85.220.222])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D08BE0B0C
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 22:36:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by fxm22 with SMTP id 22so3477889fxm.26
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:36:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to
:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type;
bh=Voa/9BnQ8eRp5Cic4QgcMhcCJQ5eID1VlfV3yxsfK1c=;
b=m5gT5OGZgGv7KeoLvhA1MVLIW6x6zIXtgt/leRjdxIggSvHh35QWXw01gab0JmiF1y
Dux9dvyJjCUGiK+rHK5tu4OKcFc/XU908su79CWIsmclisccfYvGbP+Fcxe8QaIouPvG
PF4juNeFBhtBSGaB9bk2hYMIR1Tz6UorKjba4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
b=V5JxlTzjsSVckYVYkOrrycqSZ9rrAM/i9xAGNHALhTs54ySGbZ5o5dv7eBWxOqY6UT
YC6VO36nI1t/7DczNU8BqEWgwFly7LHMREaYhOaqueDRq5uPw3TRzU+82287KE4ouaJ/
C280/ksobTCrftLtT9zHqwrXBCImfOjxJcxsA=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: yngwin.gentoo@gmail.com
Received: by 10.239.193.135 with SMTP id j7mr1081954hbi.58.1267742164728; Thu,
04 Mar 2010 14:36:04 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4B8FF8D2.4050709@gentoo.org>
References: <201003041652.56521.tampakrap@gentoo.org>
<4B8FF4FF.10501@gentoo.org> <4B8FF8D2.4050709@gentoo.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 23:36:04 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 2dd0c792bcf790a7
Message-ID: <e117dbb91003041436x397f8a3hd1d6377a13f0975@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Split desktop profile patches & news item for review
From: Ben de Groot <yngwin@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: 4d260d0d-b447-4c15-9a14-3b5e51cfadeb
X-Archives-Hash: fb9672d18f309b46bd37b0caa88de19a
On 4 March 2010 19:15, Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 03/04/2010 07:59 PM, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
>> On 03/04/10 15:52, Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
>>> Hello
>>> I have managed to split the desktop profile to gnome and kde submenus.
>>
>> How about XFCE (and LXDE)?
>
> Pointless.
>
> We (xfce) are fine with plain desktop/ profile (now, and after the gnome
> and kde flags are stripped out of it).
> The required flags are somewhat jpeg, png, dbus, cairo, gtk and that's
> about it. HAL is optional.
>
> I guess it's pretty much same for LXDE.
As LXDE lead, I am very much for a "lighter" default desktop profile
without gnome and kde specific stuff enabled (as they are going to be
in their own subprofiles). There is no need for a separate profile for
LXDE, just a base desktop profile without too much bloat.
Cheers,
--
Ben de Groot
Gentoo Linux developer (qt, media, lxde, desktop-misc)
______________________________________________________