From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-39215-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1NWgLr-0003c0-0g
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 01:24:19 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6E0D5E084B;
Mon, 18 Jan 2010 01:23:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-fx0-f228.google.com (mail-fx0-f228.google.com [209.85.220.228])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 254F9E084B
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 01:23:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by fxm28 with SMTP id 28so435510fxm.26
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 17 Jan 2010 17:23:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to
:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type;
bh=t98b/HsC1OYcgU/tE1xauhMMxFDOTVSXWyfx2WUJaj8=;
b=RlJvQF1buJN/qR9aOiI8Ez//4PjMXVFffW0cOcQ4W4BILrAU5t4JCx0bsrwzOWHt7E
hCtn/GyfS2FPsLiN6Ru6m5W6Z5vraD4xtoU/emXB8Z4eSLNtqYr6pYOnis1kA53MspUs
Or9XzPGL/fXWS58veaqSWyyX3eB0S1JmLqiyQ=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
b=EecvAzzvPha8OD/OVFCZzCSP2l2raIRZ52xu3O+KI19n2YL/A7VchQWU0O40WuvCnn
AO0XpN83pgPSY6WRIYdlxlg+Q/KXo1eFcbWqpGHpP/dWVvmbO6GglHWlFVafViB2Kpc+
ZO0K8jCxPjhsgp7fJlwiKBUK+vcUMNdqFifX8=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: yngwin.gentoo@gmail.com
Received: by 10.239.134.18 with SMTP id 18mr567061hbx.42.1263777810369; Sun,
17 Jan 2010 17:23:30 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <201001172325.47747.bangert@gentoo.org>
References: <201001112305.16532.hwoarang@gentoo.org>
<201001172120.48648.bangert@gentoo.org>
<201001171612.29206.vapier@gentoo.org>
<201001172325.47747.bangert@gentoo.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 02:23:30 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: c671590c4e3ea422
Message-ID: <e117dbb91001171723se23ce02xef8e01a11a514147@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Last rites: net-nntp/inn
From: Ben de Groot <yngwin@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: 83d92e8f-81d5-40da-9d5e-52fd0305ce5f
X-Archives-Hash: 03d9d925e0a8e046833301f8a7e5d101
2010/1/17 Thilo Bangert <bangert@gentoo.org>:
> no - i wasn't talking about maintainer-needed bugs. it is my impression,
> that many apparently maintained packages have simple bugs lingering for
> extended periods of time. Fx. users reporting bugs AND supplying fixes,
> ready to be committed.
>
> i dont want to step on anyones toes, which is why this may need to be put
> in place carefully - but i do think it would improve average quality of
> the tree.
What about something like: if a bug has been open for 2 months without
any apparent maintainer activity, anyone can step in and commit a fix?
Cheers,
--
Ben de Groot
Gentoo Linux developer (qt, media, lxde, desktop-misc)
______________________________________________________