From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-39144-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1NVok9-0002tR-CD
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 16:09:49 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8E36CE0948;
Fri, 15 Jan 2010 16:09:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-yw0-f174.google.com (mail-yw0-f174.google.com [209.85.211.174])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DDE7E0948
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 16:09:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by ywh4 with SMTP id 4so570394ywh.10
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 08:09:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to
:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type;
bh=QI8VBXMpwxJbjoEt324xvEAPLOMosHEh4PyVoespFe0=;
b=FEarRgcOrC0wNDFHygobmGngS5GGpX/ZcruAo5z6nvFXJR9d5ZcQhDKmwCWU/AgUZR
U0cntVh+TXBdnaXLdJgwGN74hmSdSxgDh87gxY3pm7qQbkuJ+mHJ4AkFVNrmSXchUNdk
ltVudMyRvkw2Ft0mhMEbwwIUHlU99eA+s2vBE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
b=Aw8nvF694uSsUHFPmcIpiogvqk0ggn+sCZBI4iYZWA7DBNbEJbGcTXLSmRCiwFj0lP
IYNSxyjo6mHtcfKD5k/TWAxhKl7salYH0ley4fVT6MbzD+LF9qABwtLHYtbwltda4412
L/ilSNTlLBiSgNQ1OBTR/tDDu7p4BdCTQ1hNE=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: yngwin.gentoo@gmail.com
Received: by 10.239.180.201 with SMTP id j9mr248853hbg.145.1263571755393; Fri,
15 Jan 2010 08:09:15 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20100115095008.5173fcbf@dante>
References: <201001112305.16532.hwoarang@gentoo.org>
<201001122030.27164.hwoarang@gentoo.org>
<20100112194037.GA917@launay.org>
<201001122149.11091.hwoarang@gentoo.org>
<e117dbb91001121235m1a6b99acj4cefccd2b5de2a35@mail.gmail.com>
<20100115095008.5173fcbf@dante>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 17:09:15 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 8736d8982521cc5d
Message-ID: <e117dbb91001150809u69fe2em434720141addb236@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Last rites: net-nntp/inn
From: Ben de Groot <yngwin@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: 91ea1647-3911-4ee5-a788-db3e84440bcc
X-Archives-Hash: f9615b8233daffa00c1e1e0fd83e5beb
I think we have a bigger problem with packages that have a maintainer,
at least nominally, but said maintainer does not actually maintain the
package anymore.
--
Ben de Groot
Gentoo Linux developer (qt, media, lxde, desktop-misc)
______________________________________________________